Neka i oni instaliraju Google, jes' da ih tako CIA i FBI prate, ali šta sad, neka ne stavljaju ruke u gaće dok guglaju.

Ko ima ovo i to sta kazes se sigurno desava.

  od sada pokrivam kamericu kada se samozadovoljavam

auuuuu koliko off topica, moderatori radite svoj posao... otvorite temu 'teoreticari zavere budale ili ne' ...

da se vratimo temi:


O čemu je reč?

"Jedna od najstarijih teorija zavere u pop-svetu tvrdi da su The Beatlesi izgubili jednog člana puno pre nego što je Mark Chapman u decembru 1980. ispalio kobne hice u Johna Lennona. Sve je počelo 12. septembra 1969. kad je Russ Gibb, DJ radio stanice WKNR-FM iz Detroita, primio neobičan telefonski poziv od osobe koja se predstavila kao 'Tom' rekavši kako neki albumi grupe sadrže skrivene tragove direktno upućujući na smrt Paula McCartneyja. Dakle, šta se dogodilo u 'paralelnoj istoriji'?

Napustivši studio, 9. novembra, Paul je seo u beli sportski Aston Martin i ne obraćajući pažnju na svetla semafora, te srede u 5 sati ujutro doživeo saobracajnu nesreću (kažu da je sleteo sa puta i razbio se o stene na dnu provalije) koju nije preživeo zbog teških povreda glave. Drugacija verzija iste priče pominje i autostoperku Ritu zbog čijih je pokreta glavom (BJob) za vreme vožnje, Paul McCartney bukvalno izgubio glavu.

Pojedinosti nesreće nikad nisu bile javno objavljene, jer u tom trenutku nikom nije odgovaralo da se "beatle-manija" zavrsi, zbog toga je održana audicija za Paulovog dvojnika, čiji pobednik nikad nije javno proglasen. A pobednik je bio je izvesni William Campbell, kanadski glumac gotovo savršeni dvojnik pokojnika. Manji detalji (nos i brada) ispravljeni su plastičnom operacijom, ali William je imao ožiljak iznad gornje usne koji se nikako nije mogao ukloniti i upravo taj ožiljak je znak raspoznavanja između Paula i njegovog dvojnika. Show se morao nastaviti…

Naravno, poznato je da su The Beatles upravo 1966. odustali od predviđene turneje, verovatno iz razloga što dvojnik još nije bio spreman, te bi, kao takav, bio vrlo brzo raskrinkan. Jos zanimljivija je odluka članova benda o promeni imidža: Pustili su brade kako bi neprimetno uvođenje Paulovog dvojnika (brada i brkovi su fantastično prekrili sporni ožiljak) proteklo što bezbolnije i bez negativnog publiciteta.

Iako se Paulov dvojnik skrivao iza brkova i brade, savest je mučila Lennona, Harrisona i Starra, pa su na omotima svojih ploča i u tekstovima svojih pesama posredno uveravali publiku u ono što javno nikad nisu smeli da priznaju.



Prvi, ujedno i najveći trag jeste antologijski omot albuma "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band", prvog albuma snimljenog nakon Paulove nesreće, a objavljenog na danasnji dan 1967. Dakle, pre punih 40. godina. Album prikazuje članove benda odevene u vojne uniforme kako stoje pored bubnja s naslovom albuma, okruženi gomilom poznatih lica.

U desnom uglu albuma, žutim cvećem, odmah ispod imena grupe formiran je oblik bas gitare, Paulovog instrumenta. Međutim, iako bas gitara ima četiri žice, ova ima samo tri, jasno sugerisući na broj preživelih članova. Dalje, to isto žuto cveće formirano je da pravi reč PAUL? upućujući na dilemu oko Paulovog postojanja.

Sad obratite pažnju na lutku desno odevenu u prugastu majicu s natpisom 'Welcome The Rolling Stones'. Model autića u njezinom krilu identičan je stvarnom modelu u kome je poginuo McCartneyja (autić je i usmjeren prema crveno-krvavoj napisanoj reči 'Stones'), a na lutku je naslonjena vozačka rukavica. Dalje, ispod lutkine leve noge nalazi se bela vazna sa žutim cvećem, ali ako znate da onde mozete videti beli auto kako pada u ambis sa zadnijim delom u plamenu, sa figurom čoveka koja iz kola ispada, videćete upravo to.

Ispod slova T u riječi imenu grupe nalazi se figurica Šive, Razaratelja, hinduističkog boga smrti (Šivu nije tako jednostavno opisati, tako da ovo 'bog smrti' uzmite s rezervom), čija ruka direktno pokazuje na Paula, a kad smo se već dotakli religije, otvoreni dlan iznad nečije glave u nekim kulturama simbolizuje smrt, a upravo je iznad Paulove glave otvoren dlan komičara Issyja Bona.

Obratite pažnju i na same članove benda, ne izgleda li Paul McCartney nekako dvodimenzionalno u odnosu na druge? Kao da je napravljen od kartona? I zašto on jedini drži crni instrument u ruci?

A ako vam ovo nije bilo dosta, pokušajte sledece: Uzmite ogledalo, postavite ga horizontalno po sredini bubnja, tačno po sredini reči LONELY HEARTS tako da odražava gornju polovinu bubnja, onu gdje piše PEPPERS. Ako spojite tekst sa omota i njegov odraz u ogledalu, dobićete ovaj tekst: I ONE IX HE DIE… 'I ONE IX' je 11/9, datum Paulove smrti (9. novembra) kao što kaže ostatak teksta ('HE DIE', između ove dvije reči je strelica koja pokazuje upravo na Paula).



Idući trag nalazi se na zadnjoj strani omota albuma. Naime, "Sgt. Peppers…" bio je prvi album koji se pojavio s otisnutim stihovima pjesama. Onde vidimo njih četvoricu i tu je Paul je jedini koji je leđima okrenut kameri, a interesantno je da Harrisonov palac pokazuje prema uvodnom stihu pjesme "She's Leaving Now", koji kaže: "Wednesday morning at five o'clock as the day begins…" Upravo tačan dan i tačno vreme Paulove smrti.

I mada su članovi grupe bili otprilike iste visine, Paul se na poleđini omota cini višim od ostalih što se tumači njegovim 'uzdizanjem' u zagrobni život, a primetite reči pesme koje prekrivaju Paulovu glavu: Pjesma je "Within You, Without You", a stihovi su "Without You".

Takođe, ako obratite pažnju na prste članova benda, videćete jednu neobičnost: Harrison (u crvenom) drži prste u obliku slova L, Lennon (u zelenom) drži obe ruke u dzepovima u stilu Ala Bundyja praveći tako slovo V, a Starrovi (u ružičastom) prsti su isprepleteni u obliku slova E. Paul (u plavom) okrenut je, kao što smo rekli, leđima, ali nije teško zaključiti da nedostaje slovo O u riječi L-O-V-E.

Znate li da su stihovi pesama otisnuti na ploči u tri vertikalna reda i da ih na tako i treba čitati. Ali, ako stihove sa "Sgt. Peppers…" albuma čitamo vodoravno s leva na desno dobićemo sledeću rečenicu: "Neko te zove, ti odgovaraš prilično sporo - u sredu u pet ujutro dok počinje dan - život teče u tebi, ali bez tebe - sam si na ulici". A', da, jedna od pesama na ovom albumu zove se "Lovely Rita", tako se zvala, navodna, autostoperka.?



I za kraj ovog albuma - fotografija na košuljici ploče prikazuje četvorku s pogledom u kameru. Na Paulovom lijevom ramenu je oznaka OPP (Ontario Provincial Police). Ontario je pokrajina u Kanadi, a William Campbell navodno je neko vreme bio zaposlen kao policajac. Ali OPP oznaka snimljena je pod takvim uglom da pravi inicijale OPD, što je kanadska oznaka: Officially Pronounced Dead ("Zvanično proglašem mrtvim").

Kad je svima postalo jasno da su The Beatles pred razlazom, ultimativni trag ostavljen je na omotu albuma "Abbey Road" iz 1969. Čuvena fotografija Iana MacMillana prikazuje četvorku kako prelaze pešački prelaz ispred studija u kome su snimali. Na čelu kolone je Lennon, odeven u belo i sa dugom bradom, iza njega Starr odeven u crno odelo, a posljednji je Harrison, odeven u plavo radničko odelo. Između Starra i Harrisona zatvorenih očiju, bos i u raskoraku s ostalima korača McCartney držeći cigaretu u desnoj ruci.



Fotografija predstavlja, pogrebnu povorku: Lennon je svestenik (neko kaže i bog), Starr je ili ožalošćena rodbina, ili pogrebnik, McCartney je mrtvac (zatvorene oči i bez cipela), a Harrison je grobar. Nekome je ovo ključna fotografija koja pokazuje da je McCartneyjevo mesto zauzeo dvojnik. Naime, McCartney je levoruk, a ovde cigaretu drži u desnoj ruci.

Sa leve strane ulice parkirana je bela 'buba' (engl. Beatle) s registaracijom: LMW 28IF. LMW se tumači kao Linda McCartney Weeps, a 28IF je broj godina koje bi Paul imao da je (IF) još uvek živ. Iza 'bube' nalazi se još jedan auto koji kao da "gadja" u Paulovu glavu, a s desne strane parkirano je crno vozilo - može da bude taksi, a može da bude i pogrebno vozilo."

Preneseno sa Bloga B92.net, autor Dule Nedeljković

Taksiji su u Engleskoj obicno, gle cuda, crni, ko u Njujorku zuti. Inace, lepo sklopljena prica, nesto slicno kao i sto je Elvis Prisli poreklom Musliman iz Bosne doseljenik u Ameriku posto je Elvis cesto muslimansko ime u Bosni a prezime moze da bude izvedeno od Preslic ili Prislic pa lako prepraviti na Prisli. Kako je u to vreme bilo nepopularno biti Italijan, Balkanac, Spanac i slicno, nigde nije spominja odakle je vec uzivao slavu.
Inace, pre nekog vremena sam citao clanak o onom tipu sto ih je posmatrao. Taj tp je jos danas ziv, bio je u poseti Londonu sa svojom zenom i tek odskora je sebe slucajno prepoznao na omotu koji je video negde u izlogu neke prodavnice. Inace, covek slusa klasiku, od Bitlsa je cuo samo za ime.

Na stranu mentalno zdravlje, fascinira me mašta čoveka ili ljudi koji su pisali gornji tekst.

Kakva tema. 



Zaista ne vidim razlog. Pogotovo sto se zna da smrt clana benda donosi nevidjeni publicitet pa bi im u tom slucaju prodaja albuma porasla u nebesa. 

Pa bilo bi dosadno bre da nije paranoje 

 Odličan tekst tribiani.

Odlično pitanje samo znaj da se svašta dešavalo i da je sve moguće. Kako-mogu samo da pretpostavljam ali pitanje je na mestu i treba to istraživati jer ovo nije onaj Paul definitivno.
 
  Ko ima dobro oko uočiće razlike (u pitanju su slike neposredno pre 1966 i malo nakon).
 
     Paul                                                                       Faul


      66                                                                            67




   

Paul                                                                                 Faul

Takodje važan info sa forenzičke analize;
----------------------------------------------------------

(Note from Eric Hufschmid)

    Last year the cover-story of Wired Italia, the Italian edition of the US magazine Wired, was about two Italian researchers who tried to disprove the conspiracy theory that Paul McCartney had been replaced by an impostor. A man in Italy considered the article to have a lot of valuable information, and so he sent me a summary of it. His article is below (I edited it a bit). This article ought to get you wondering,
    Who benefits from this incredible deception?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul is Dead:
New evidence based on computer enhanced forensic techniques

7 July 2010


Chiedi chi era quel «Beatle»  (Literal translation: Ask who was that "Beatle")



    The cover-story Chiedi chi era quel «Beatle» for the July 15 2009 issue of Wired Italia, the Italian edition of the US magazine Wired, describes the analysis of the McCartney conspiracy theory conducted by two Italians, Gabriella Carlesi and Francesco Gavazzeni (the man and woman in the photo).

    Their purpose for analyzing this conspiracy theory was to provide indisputable, scientific evidence that would put an end to the persistent rumors that Paul McCartney had died in a car accident in 1966. However, the results of their analysis surprised them. Instead of putting an end to the rumors, their analysis provides scientific evidence that the Paul McCartney of today is not the same man as the Paul McCartney prior to 1966.

    By coincidence, on that same day that this article appeared in Italy, Paul McCartney was at the Ed Sullivan theater in New York City to appear on the David Letterman television show and to give a free, outdoor performance on top of the marquee of the Ed Sullivan theater. He and Letterman laughed about the silly rumor that Paul McCartney had died in 1966. We could interpret McCartney's appearance in New York City as an attempt to distract Americans from the publication of the Italian article, and to encourage Americans to laugh at the McCartney conspiracy theories.

    I will use the name Paul to refer to Paul McCartney before the 1966 car accident, and Faul to refer to the Paul McCartney after the accident. So, are Paul and Faul the same person?
     


Who are Gabriella Carlesi and Francesco Gavazzeni?


  Gabriella Carlesi is forensic pathologist who specializes in identification of people through craniometry (i.e. comparison of certain features of the skull) and forensic odontology (i.e. analysis of the teeth), while Francesco Gavazzeni is a specialist in computer analyses. By putting their talents together, they were able to use a computer to obtain high precision measurements of Paul McCartney's skull from various photos of his face.

    Certain features of our skull, teeth, and ears are extremely effective for identifying us; some of them cannot currently be modified by surgery. In fact, in Germany, the identification of the shape of the right ear has the same legal value of that of a DNA test or fingerprints detection.


Gabriella Carlesi has been a consultant for identification of people via digital image processing for various investigations, including:

    • The identification of Sergei Antonov in the scenario of the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, in relation to the "Mitrokhin Archive" (for an Italian Parliament Commission),

    • The identification of Francesco Narducci, connected to the investigation of the so called "Monster of Florence,"

    • The murder of journalist Ilaria Alpi and her camera operator Miran Hrovatin (for an Italian Parliament Commission),

    • The assassination of Benito Mussolini and his mistress Claretta Petacci (for a historical reconstruction).


Forensic evidence based on photographs

    The two researchers began their analysis by obtaining high quality photos of Paul McCartney before and after the car accident. Gavazzeni complained that some photos taken before 1966 were not properly dated (sometimes different photo agencies would have different dates for the same photo), and that some of the best photos were the property of photographers who were very reluctant to release them. However, they eventually found two good quality photos dated before 1966 and two after 1967.

    Different photos of a human face, in order to be compared, have to be re-sized to match the same scale; to do this, one feature of the face must be used as a scaling factor.
    These two researchers opted for the distance between the pupils. In other words, the photos were scaled so that the distance between the pupils was exactly the same for all of them.

    Once photos of a person have been scaled so that the eyes have identical locations, then if you lay the photos on top of each other, certain features will match exactly, such as the shape of the skull. The skin and hair may be very different, but the skulls should be identical.


 -Both of the photos taken prior to 1966 matched one another perfectly, and both of the photos taken after 1967 matched one another perfectly.

However, the researchers were shocked to discover that the photos prior to 1966 did not match the photos taken after 1967.

For example, the frontal curvature of the jaw was different (i.e. the curve going from one ear to the other and passing through the chin, which you see when looking directly into a face, as in the photos on the right) and the jaw arc was also different (i.e. the curve of the jaw that you would see if looking downward at the head from above).

    Gavazzeni noticed a common feature of Faul's early photos that is not seen in his recent photos: a dark area shadowing the external corner of the left eye. That area now shows something half-way between a scar and something that resembles skin that was stretched as a consequence of cosmetic surgery, or, as Gavazzeni suggests, of an imperfect cosmetic surgery.

    Photos show that Faul's head is more oblong than Paul's head. Gavazzeni pointed out that some of the early printed photos of Faul must have been compressed in height in order to make his head appear shorter and more rounded. He said his conclusion is inescapable because the shape of the skull of an adult cannot be altered. He said there was a simple trick for stretching or compressing photos during the printing process in those days before computer photo editing became available, so it would have been very easy for them to do this trick.

    Carlesi pointed out that the line separating Faul's lips is much wider, to the point that it was obvious even when Faul grew a mustache, perhaps in an attempt to hide that detail. Lips can be inflated and increased in volume, but the wideness of their separating line can be altered only to a small extent.

    More interesting is the position, relative to the skull, of the point where the nose detaches from the face, because it can not modified by surgery. According to Carlesi, these points for Paul and Faul are considerably different.

Some features of the ear are also useful for identification purposes because these as well are not modifiable through surgery. Carlesi and Gavazzeni determined that the ears of Paul and Faul differed significantly.    


         
        Teeth can be altered... to a certain extent

 Some features of the human body can be altered, such the position and slope of teeth (dental braces do this for millions of people).

Carlesi noticed that the teeth configurations for Paul and Faul do not match, but in a very curious way.

In Paul's mouth, his upper right canine tooth is pushed out of its normal position because there is not enough room in his jaw for all of his teeth to fit properly.

In Faul's mouth, that same canine tooth is also crooked, but there is plenty of room in his jaw for all of his teeth. Since no other teeth are pushing against the crooked tooth, how did that tooth become crooked?

Carlesi concludes that the crooked tooth in Faul's mouth was the result of a dental operation to simulate the crooked tooth in Paul's mouth.

 
 ( http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Wired_Teeth_Crop.jpg )

Carlesi was even more amazed at the difference in the shape of the palate. It was so narrow in Paul that some teeth were misaligned (such as the canine tooth mentioned above), but Faul's palate was so wide that the front teeth did not rotate with respect to their axis, or tilt, as was happening for Paul, with the only exception of that upper right canine (mentioned above) which leans outward.

Carlesi points out that altering the shape of a person's palate, although possible in the 1960s, would have required a traumatic surgical operation (the breaking of a bone. She doesn't say which bone, but seems to refer to the hard palate), and it would have required the wearing of fixed dental braces for more than a year. Therefore, if the conspiracy theories are false - i.e., if the Paul McCartney that we see today with a large palate is the original Paul McCartney with a small palate - then Paul went through some very serious dental surgeries, and he would have suffered for a long time, and it would have had an effect on his voice.

The more logical conclusion is that the Paul McCartney of today is a substitute, and that Faul went through a much simpler dental operation to make one of his teeth crooked.

              A DNA test!

Carlesi and Gavazzeni commented that if McCartney really wanted to put an end to these rumors, he could have offered to take a DNA test with his father or his younger brother, Mike, but he didn't. McCartney took a DNA test only once, but the authors of the article point out that the DNA test created more confusion and suspicion of his true identity, not less.

In 1962, when the Beatles were living in Hamburg, Germany and still unknown to most people, Paul McCartney had a brief affair with a German woman named Erika Wohlers. She gave birth to a daughter, Bettina, in December 1962, which was during the time the Beatles were starting to become famous. The Beatles soon left Germany, and McCartney abandoned Erica. Around 1967 McCartney agreed to pay 30,000 deutsche marks to support Bettina, but he was not admitting to being her father, even though she claims her German birth certificate identifies him as her father!

Once Bettina became an adult, she asked a German court to have McCartney recognize her as his natural daughter. McCartney had to submit to a DNA test, and the test showed that he was not her father. Interestingly, based on an autograph signed by McCartney, together with some photos taken for the occasion, Bettina accused the person who took that DNA test of being a substitute for Paul, not the real Paul McCartney! The autograph, for instance, was signed by somebody right-handed (Paul was left-handed). More information about this DNA test is here.

            Carlesi and Gavazzeni do some damage control

Both of the Italian researchers were shocked to discover that the conspiracy theories appear valid, so at the end of the article they do some damage control by pointing out that since McCartney is a famous person, more analyses should be conducted before anybody makes these accusations so that we can be 100% certain about the conclusion.

Earlier in that article, Gavazzeni admitted that the more they were pressured to release the results of their analysis, the more they tried to stall for time because the evidence was pointing in the opposite direction of what they were hoping for. Unfortunately for them, the more the time they spent analyzing the evidence, the more certain they became that Paul McCartney really did die in 1966!

It's also amusing to note that Carlesi said that she had agreed to get involved in the analysis because she assumed it would require only a few minutes of her time to prove that Paul and Faul are the same person!

              Some comments from the readers of the Italian article

Some readers posted interesting comments at the bottom of the on-line version of the Wired Italia article:

    • Reader frabot, on August 22, 2009 at 23:42:07 suggests to watch the Late Show with David Letterman for July 15, 2009 (is it a coincidence that this is the same date of the publication of that article by Wired Italia?), in which McCartney jokes about the idea that Paul died in 1966. That footage is interesting because Faul seems to lie:
    youtube.com/watch?v=1kYDdBWESQw

    • Reader Luca, on August 1, 2009 at 13:11:29 claims to have analyzed the voices of Paul and Faul and that their timbres differ. He also points out that after that accident the Beatles significantly changed they hair styles, especially McCartney, who conveniently had slightly longer hair on the right side of his head.

    • Reader easytale, on July 30, 2009 at 9:53:35 points out that Faul played live only a very few times, songs like Yesterday, and that he played them only after the 1980s. And once, around the year 2000, he played in Canada using his right hand!

                  So, recapitulating:

    • Forensic evidence shows that Faul is not Paul;

    • Old photos were altered to make Faul more closely resemble Paul;

    • Faul went through some dental operation(s) to have some of his teeth misaligned to mimic Paul's particular defects;

    • Faul had to learn to become left-handed.

     Some questions remain unanswered:

    • How many people have been threatened, intimidated, killed, or bribed to keep quiet about this?

    • Who benefits from this deception? How did the McCartney family benefit from this? How did the Beatles benefit? How did the fans of the Beatles benefit? How does the media benefit? Who benefited? If Paul McCartney died accidentally, would so many people have joined in this deception? Why would so many people be willing to participate in the cover-up of a car accident? Maintaining this deception is extremely difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and if nobody benefits, that would be a sign that this is a cover-up of some type of horrible, diabolical crime. This may be one of the tricks the Jews are using to control people in leadership positions.

    • Did you see the 1978 movie Capricorn One? In that movie, NASA decides to fake the first manned mission to Mars (I wonder where the Jewish scriptwriter Peter Hyams got this idea from...). NASA secretly removes the astronauts from the spacecraft and takes them to a abandoned military base that has a Mars movie set. Then they perform their landing on Mars and broadcast the video to the world. However, when the Mars mission is complete and the empty space craft enters the Earth's atmosphere to return the astronauts, it accidentally burns up. The astronauts who faked the Mars landing are horrified as they realize that the world now assumes that all of them are dead! Now, what would the Jews have done with Faul if his surgery to resemble Paul ended up terribly wrong? Did he consider such possibilities?

    • People on the Internet are referring to Paul McCartney's replacement as "Faul ", but a more appropriate name might be Fool, or Sucker, or accessory to a horrible crime. Or is he a victim who was deceived by the people who killed Paul McCartney? Will he continue to cover up this crime?

 Sa: http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html