Ah,neko mooora da bude pametan pa to ti je!Pa sta ako ima vec negde!?U ko zna kojem se kontekstu spominje...

Ej, nemoj ti da diras Aneu , ona je savestan modetator  :shakefist:

:mrhappy:

 ``Samo sam..``je pravdanje svoje agresivnosti.Joca je bas dobar a ti ga ponizavas.

More dokle cu ja da budem ``ucesnik diskusija`` !?100 godina sam ovde.. 

Pravilnikom Burek Foruma zabranjeno je postovanje dvaput zaredom , posto nema moderatora u ove sitne sate, osecam duznost da ti to napomenem 

Ne zelim da politizujem temu ali...

Visoku "emotivnu inteligenciju" imali su Napleon, Hitler, Sloba, itd...

Ostalo nije potrebno komentarisati...

Ma,ja nemam sta da filozofiram na ovu temu,znam da mi je EQ ispod proseka za vecinu stvari,nekako se ne snalazim i Bog.

Milosava...

Koliko ja znam IQ znaci: intelligence quotient.

Prema tome, emotional intelligence bi trebalo da bude EI.

Pametnice Emotional Quotient, je i pravi naziv
WikiPedia

Evo sta nadjoh....

Emotional Intelligence vs "EQ"

Most writers interchange the terms "EQ" and "emotional intelligence". I believe, however, it is useful to try to make distinction a person's person's innate potential versus what actually happens to that potential over their lifetime. I believe each baby is born with a certain potential for emotional sensitivity, emotional memory, emotional processing and emotional learning ability. It is these four inborn components which I believe form the core of one's emotional intelligence.

This innate intelligence can be either developed or damaged with life experiences, particularly by the emotional lessons taught by the parents, teachers, caregivers and family during childhood and adolescence. The impact of these lessons results in what I refer to as one's level of "EQ." in other words, as I use the term, "EQ" represents a relative measure of a person's healthy or unhealthy development of their innate emotional intelligence.

When I say "EQ" I am not talking about a numerical test score like IQ. It is simply a convenient name I am using. As far as I know, I am the only writer who is making a distinction between inborn potential and later development or damage. I believe it is possible for a child to begin life with a high level of innate emotional intelligence, but then learn unhealthy emotional habits from living in an abusive home. Such a child will grow up to have what I would call low EQ. I would suspect that abused, neglected and emotionally damaged children will score much lower on the existing emotional intelligence tests compared to others having the same actual original emotional intelligence at birth.

As I see it, I believe, then, that it is possible for a person to start out with high EI, but then be emotionally damaged in early childhood, causing a low EQ later in life. On the other hand, I believe it is possible for a child to start out with relatively low EI, but receive healthy emotional modeling, nurturing etc., which will result in moderately high EQ. Let me stress however that I believe it is much easier to damage a high EI child than to develop the EQ of a low EI child. This follows the principle that it is generally easier to destroy than create.

In comparison to say, mathematical intelligence, it is important to note that relatively few people start out with high innate mathematical abilities and then have this ability damaged through misleading or false math training or modeling. I say relatively few because I mean in comparison to the number of emotionally sensitive children who receive unhealthy and self-destructive emotional imprinting from any number of sources. Parents and television shows don't generally teach that 2+2=968. But they do often teach emotional lessons which are as equivalent in unhealthiness as this equation is in inaccuracy. Or we might say which would be as damaging to an intimate relationship as the false equation would be to the career of an accountant.

At present, all other models of emotional intelligence, including even the most "pure" of the group, the Mayer/Salovey/Caruso model, combine the measurement of the innate emotional variables (sensitivity, memory, processing and learning) with the environmental affects on those same variables. Certain writers have defined intelligence in general as "potential." (1) I agree with this and this is why I want to distinguish between EI and EQ.