A uz to je tvrdio da tako nesto nije ni izvodljivo (sto se kasnije pokazalo kao tacno).


Da li ti to @Torivoje pokusavas da kazes da je S. Popovic bio glavnokomandujuci NATO snaga
ili mozda generalni sekretar NATO-a ?

Као што већ рекох у његово политичко деловање не улазим и недоследност његове политике...

Поново мешаш његово адвокатско деловање са политичким...

I ti ponovo ne čitaš šta napisah.Čovek je pravno zastupao stranku u aktivnom procesu.




Da li to ti,Sistemac,tvrdiš da je istinita ona dečja čikalica : "Imena luda-nalaze se svuda ! " ,pa se tako i Popovićevo našlo na peticiji koja je kasnije služila kao dokaz da su se i "intelektualci" slagali sa Klintonovom ratničkom doktrinom ?

Peticiji ? I sta sa tim ? Ta peticija ( ako postoji uopste ) ima tezinu i vrednost koliko i pola ispusene lule duvana.

Ko zna, mozda predsednik SAD/Rusije/Kine ili gen. sek. NATO i donose odluke na osnovu peticija. 

Je li sistem, sta mislis da mi pisemo peticiju da te twice zgazi kolima na pesackom?
Da li je to prijateljski i dobronameran gest?

Pisite.

Изгледа да не читам добро... пише... kao unajmljeni pravni zastupnik ženskadije familije Đinđić.

Али и да је заступао и странку то опет није недоследност...

Недоследност би било када не би заступао некога или би искључиво заступао своје политичке истомишљенике...а то ова листа кога је све бранио јасно показује да није истина...

Vi´š,kad´god se Jenkiji spremaju nekoga da satru rastosiljavajući se nagomilanih zaliha oružja,oni posegnu za zabrinutom javnošću/humanistima/intelektualcima...Francuska su govanca devedesetih radila isto.Istu su stvar radili i fašisti/nacisti ( http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223 ) .Dakle,svima je njima afirmacija značila.
Mene Popovićevo ime na toj peticiji ne tišti,sasvim se uklapa u ono što sam o čoveku mislio tokom devedesetih.
Sve je započelo mojim ukazivanjem na (gromoglasno) medijsko "zaboravljanje" na Artukovića (istina,nakon što sam uputio poruku,"Alo" je barem objavio moj komentar).Nekome se,očigledno,epizoda sa Artukovićem ne uklapa u priču o "dobrome čika-Popoviću".

----------------------------------

Evo ga odličan intervju samoga pokojnika u kome on sam priznaje prepletanje svoje privatne i profesionalne stvarnosti :

    http://peacemagazine.org/archive/v10n2p08.htm


Citiram :

" ...Drakulic: You signed a petition last fall calling for the bombing of the Serb positions in Bosnia or even Serbia. I would expect people to ask you certain questions, such as: Are you not committing an act of treason against your own people, let alone the state of Serbia?

Popovic: Well, I'm a lawyer, so technically yes, I am committing an act of treason under Serbian laws. But I distinguish between the interests of the Serbian state and the Serbian people and I think these interests are opposed at this moment. The military defeat of the Milosovic government is in the best interest of the Serbian people. It is something that every good Serbian patriot should wish for. I don't think I betrayed my people.

Drakulic: From a Serbnationalist point of view one could also say that you are now siding with the Moslem, or Croat secessionists vis-a-vis Yugoslavia, against the Serb secessionists vis-a-vis Croatia or Bosnia-Herzegovina. How would you respond to that?

Popovic: I was against secessionism from the very beginning. I thought that Yugoslavia was an idea that made sense. The disaster was started by Milosevic with the help of the Yugoslav Army. The amount of hatred, resentment, revanchism, is enormous, and you can no longer even contemplate any Yugoslavia, at least in the foreseeable future. But I understood from the very beginning that the duty of any reasonable and honest person in former Yugoslavia is to oppose the aggressive militaristic nationalist policies of his own government. If everybody did so, this war wouldn't have happened. It is my duty to be concerned with the Serbian government and what it does. It is Croatians' duty to be concerned with what the Croatian government does. If we did otherwise, we would be just helping to reproduce the same process.

Drakulic: By signing such a petition, are you not suggesting that violence and war can solve certain political problems, such as the problem of an armed Serb seccession from Bosnia-Herzegovina, or from Croatia?

Popovic: I think that's an unfair question. If I see somebody trying to murder somebody else, of course my duty is to try to stop him. I'm not saying that by doing so and applying violence to the situation, I'm actually trying to help those people lead a good life. I don't know what they will do once they leave the scene. What I see Serbs doing in Bosnia is committing an act of aggression against a state that has been recognized by United Nations, and I see them committing genocide. I think that both of these things should be stopped. Of course, stopping it would not solve the problem of how these people will live next to each other in the future, but first you have to stop the crimes. The international community has an obligation to do so, under the Convention on Genocide and the Charter of the United Nations. They have an obligation to use force to stop aggression, and to stop genocide.

Drakulic: But in Central Bosnia then, wouldn't they have to bomb the Croats when they commit genocide against the Moslems? Or bomb the Serbs when they commit genocide against the Croats? And wouldn't they have to bomb the Moslems whenever they commit genocide against whomever-Croats or Serbs?..."

Zanci jeste prijateljski gest? Ili nije?

Не спорим интелигенцију цјењеног адвоката. Међутим изнад свега је био покварени љигавац који се стављао на страну моћника против својих.