@redman85
Hvala ti na odličnoj emisiji sa Fokus radija.

Definitivno:
Močuge će da rade

Planovi Amerike da se izvrsi pritisak na EU zbog suprotstavljanja njenih clanica GMO hrani.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/03/wikileaks-us-eu-gm-crops

Nisam bas upoznat sa gmo hranom, zar je moguce da je toliko opasna koliko prica Aleksic, a da niko u Srbiji ne govori o tome osim jedne nevladine organizacije? 

Genetically modified crops are the key to human survival, says UK's chief scientist
Sir John Beddington argues that moves to block GM crops on moral grounds are no longer sustainable

Moves to block cultivation of genetically modified crops in the developing world can no longer be tolerated on ethical or moral grounds, the government's chief scientist, Sir John Beddington, has warned. He said the world faced "a perfect storm" of issues that could lead to widespread food shortages and public unrest over the next few decades. His warning comes in the wake of food riots in north Africa and rising global concern about mounting food prices.

"A number of very important factors are about to change our world," said Beddington, an expert in population biology. "Its population is rising by six million every month and will reach a total of around 9,000 million by 2050. At the same time, it is estimated that by 2030 more than 60% of the population will be living in cities and will no longer be involved in growing crops or raising domestic animals. And on top of that the world's population is getting more prosperous and able to pay for more food."

Beddington said these factors indicated that the world was going to need 40% more food, 30% more water and 50% more energy by the middle of the century – at a time when climate change was starting to have serious environmental impacts on the planet, flooding coastal plains, spreading deserts and raising temperatures. "We could cut down tropical rain forests and plant crops on the savannahs to grow more food, but that would leave us even more vulnerable to the impact of global warming and climate change. We needed these regions to help absorb carbon dioxide emissions, after all."

Beddington said humanity had to face the fact that every means to improve food production should now be employed, including widespread use of new biotechnological techniques in farming. He stressed that no harm should be inflicted on humans or the environment. His remarks were made in advance of publication tomorrow of a major report, "The Future of Food and Farming".

His office's report is a specific attempt to highlight moves that could halt devastation of the planet. Crucially, the report will be presented tomorrow not just to the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), but also to the Department for International Development, which directs UK foreign aid. Beddington said he would present details of his office's report in Washington next month. He also hoped it would be debated at other events, including the G8 and G20 summits.

He emphasised the role of modern biotechnological techniques, including GM crops, in the future of global food production. "There will be no silver bullet, but it is very hard to see how it would be remotely sensible to justify not using new technologies such as GM. Just look at the problems that the world faces: water shortages and salination of existing water supplies, for example. GM crops should be able to deal with that."

Such remarks will enrage many environmental groups, who believe it is wrong for the west to impose a technology it has developed on the third world. But Beddington was adamant about the benefits of GM crop technology. "Around 30% of food is lost before it can be harvested because it is eaten by pests that we never learnt how to control. We cannot afford that kind of loss to continue. GM should be able to solve that problem by creating pest-resistant strains, for example. Of course, we will have to make sure these crops are properly tested; that they work; that they don't harm people; and that they don't harm the environment."

GM crops alone would not be sufficient to hold off widespread starvation, he added. No single approach would guarantee food security for humanity for the rest of the century. A widespread approach, including the development of proper sustainability, protecting fish stocks and changes to patterns of consumption, was also critical, he said. "This report was set up to find out if we can feed nine billion people sustainably, healthily and equitably. We can, but it will take many different approaches to crack the problem."

Timing was crucial. "In 2008 food prices rocketed to their highest level for decades. People said it was just a one-off, but last year what happened? Wheat prices saw their fastest ever increase. The era of declining food prices is over and we have to face that," he added.

Almost a billion people now suffer serious food shortages and face starvation. "It is unimaginable that in the next 10 to 20 years that there will not be a worsening of that problem unless we take action now, and we have to include the widest possible range of solutions."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/23/gm-foods-world-population-crisis
---------------------
Five crazy and new genetically modified foods

Who would have known 20 years ago that so many of the foods that we eat would be produced in a lab rather than nature? Scientifically designed seeds are becoming a larger than ever portion of our diet and for the most part, it's difficult for the consumer to even realize it because of a lack of labeling.
According to Sustainable Table, about 200 million acres of farmland worldwide are now used to grow genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The most common GMO crops are soybeans, which represent 63 percent of all GMO crops, corn at 19 percent, cotton at 13 percent, and canola at 5 percent.
The list of seeds, and later foods, that have already been modified also include alfalfa, tomatoes, chicory, flax, papaya, potato, rice, sugar beets, and squash. The future of our global food supply is laden with seeds, and most recently animals, modified for human consumption. You may be surprised to see what's on the horizon.
None of these have been approved yet by the FDA, but with what we've seen so far, who's to say that they won't be in the future.
 
1. Super Chicken Eggs
New biotechnology is being used to develop genetically modified chickens that produce compounds that can be harvested from the eggs. The compounds in the eggs can be used to fight a range of diseases from diabetes, to viruses to tooth decay, according to Jacqueline Jacob and Richard Miles - Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
According to the BBC, U.K. scientists have developed genetically modified chickens capable of laying eggs containing proteins needed to make cancer-fighting drugs.
While these additives may be beneficial on their own, I think most of us would prefer to know what medications and drugs we were taking, rather than getting them in the form of an egg. Let alone all the side effects from feeding people all these extra additives.
[ Related: Are You Eating Genetically Modified Foods? ]
 

2. Non-Browning Apples
According to Food Safety News, Okanagan Specialty Fruits of Summerland, British Columbia, a biotechnology company, has submitted an application to the U.S Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service for market approval for a GMO apple that doesn't brown after being sliced.
The apple doesn't brown because the gene that produces the enzyme polyphenol oxidase (what actually turns the apple brown) is silenced. The apples still brown but just not as quickly. What's next, avocados that never go bad and pears that never get brown spots? Crazy stuff.
[ Related: Are you Ready for the Genetically Modified "Frankenapple"? ]
 
3. Fast-Growing Salmon
Unless you've been hibernating for the past few months, you've heard about this one and with good reason because salmon would be the first GMO animal approved by the FDA for human consumption.
According to Ars Technica:
These genetically modified Atlantic salmon have two foreign DNA sequences inserted into their genomes. One encodes a growth hormone from Chinook salmon. The other is the on-switch used by an antifreeze gene from ocean pout, an eel-like fish found in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. When placed alongside the growth hormone, this on-switch makes the salmon produce the growth hormone in cold weather when they otherwise wouldn't. Importantly, the GM salmon do not grow larger than regular salmon; they just achieve their size in sixteen to eighteen months rather than three years.
The FDA isn't evaluating the environmental concerns including pollution, waste, mating, and concentration of disease that go along with Aqua Bounty's approval, just whether it's safe for human consumption and it's way too early to know that either.
[ Related: Frankenfish ]
 
4. Hyper-Producing Seeds
Scientists are working to manipulate DNA to create hyper-producing seeds, specifically plum tomato seeds that increase the yield by half.
Zachary Lippman and his team at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, produced a strain of hyper-productive tomato seeds by altering the command gene that tells plants when and how many flowers to generate, according to the New York Times. He's also thinking about the modification in melons and soybeans.
 

5. Enviro-Pigs
Christine over at TreeHugger wrote that Canada has approved limited production of animals dubbed "enviropigs," pigs that are modified to produce 65 percent less phosphorous in their poop and urine.
Pig farms are notorious for producing a world of waste, three times more excrement than human beings do. Lloyd wrote about a Rolling Stone article entitled "Pork's Dirty Little Secret" which reported that an estimated 500,000 pigs at a subsidiary of pork giant Smithfield generate more fecal matter each year than the 1.5 million inhabitants of Manhattan. The stream of waste is loaded with phosphorus which causes the growth of excessive algae in lakes and streams which in turn, sucks the oxygen out of water and kills off all life.
But even still, scientifically altering a pig so that it's less polluting seems counterintuitive to me.

Preneto sa...

ne valja...

Aleksic mozda maalo preteruje kada prica o svetskom stavu prema Srbiji.na primer,kad u jednom delu kaze da postoji zavera protiv Srba-nema tu zavere,samo nas smatraju ciganima.

ali ne preteruje kada prica o posledicama unosenja tog smeca.

a ni kada prica o tome kako treba postupati sa ljudima koji bi da taj otrov sire ovde-motika po glavi,bato!




ko god misli,ili jos gore-sere da je svetska glad posledica nedostatka hrane(globalno),i da ce GMO smece resiti to,je ili povezan sa kompanijama koje se time bave,ili budala.sto mu dodje isto.

Иди у неки ид бројних Школа,Факултета,Инстиута,Академија твог града:
Gradski zavod za javno zdravlje, Bul. despota Stefana 54a, 2078-600, www.zdravlje.org.rs
Institut za javno zdravlje Srbije "Dr Milan Jovanović – Batut", Dr Subotića 5, 2684-566, www.batut.org.rs
Naučni institut za veterinarstvo Srbije Vojvode Toze 14, tel: 604-020, faks: 697-797
Institut za higijenu i tehnologiju mesa Kaćanskog 13, tel: 650-655, faks: 651-825
Institut za stočarstvo Zemun, Autoput 16, tel: 691-611, faks: 670-164
Institut za molekularnu genetiku i genetičko inženjerstvo Bulevar vojvode Stepe 444a, tel: 397-5744, faks: 397-5808
Biološki fakultet, Studentski trg 16, tel. 2635-627, www.bio.bg.ac.rs
Medicinski fakultet, Dr Subotića 8, tel. 3616-117, www.med.bg.ac.rs
Poljoprivredni fakultet, Nemanjina 6, Zemun, tel. 2615-315, www.agrifaculty.bg.ac.rs
Fakultet veterinarske medicine, Bul. oslobođenja 18, tel. 3615-436, www.vet.bg.ac.rs
Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet, Mije Kovačevića 11b, tel. 2762-958, www.bfspc.bg.ac.rs

,и питај их!

Питај их шта они мисле?
Да ли имају било какво мишљење?

Да ли имају БИЛО КАКВО мишљење о БИЛО ЧЕМУ?
Чак и погрешно?
-----------------------
Eви пример научног закључка:

Према важећим прописима у Србији (Закон о ГМО „Службени лист
СРЈ” бр. 21/2001) забрањено je комерцијално гајење ГМ биљака, а доз-
вољена су истраживања и употреба биотехнолошких производа под конт-
ролом државе. Тренутно је одобрен само увоз сојине сачме (млевена соја
која се користи као сточна храна) из roundup ready соје. Извори релатив-
но честе контаминације генетски модификованим организмима (ГМО) у
Србији (први пут 1997. године у Сојапротеину из Бечеја, потом 1999. го-
дине на малој парцели у близини Новог Сада, 2000. године на пољима у
Бачкој и Срему, 2001. године у околини Новог Сада на три парцеле укуп-
не површине 5–7 хектара,... 2005. године у Мачви на 370 хектара код 270
произвођача и на подручју Сурчина на 55 хектара итд.) су највероватније
илегално унесено семе из Румуније и помоћ у храни. ГМО су у Савезној
Републици Југославији (СРЈ) први пут добили публицитет 2001. године,
када је након велике суше 2000. године која је изазвала недостатак сточне
хране због драстичног смањења приноса соје, увезено 50.000 тона ГМ
соје у оквиру програма америчке помоћи. Тада је југословенским власти-
ма речено да ће контаминација бити мања од 5%. СРЈ је два пута одбила
америчке донације (први пут Савезно министарство за пољопривреду а
други пут Црна Гора) јер се пошиљка састојала од целих зрна соје и куку-
руза. Косово, које је у више наврата примило велике количине америчке
помоћи у храни, сматра се озбиљним извором ГМО.

На крају, питање је да ли је нама у овом тренутку потребна ГМ храна
и можемо ли без ње. Србија за сада нема економски интерес да производи
ГМ биљне културе, напротив, много је рационалније да се прогласи произ-
водном зоном без ГМО, како би европском тржишту понудила бренд орган-
ске хране. Пошто се тиме не би забранио увоз ГМО потребно је радити на
јачању институционалних капацитета и едукацији грађана у циљу демис-
тификације примене биотехнологије у пољопривредној производњи.

http://scindeks-clanci.nb.rs/data/pdf/0354-401X/2008/0354-401X0804193P.pdf#search="genetski modifikovana"
-----------------
за остало:

http://scindeks.nb.rs/SearchResults.aspx?query=ARTAK%26and%26gmo&page=0&sort=1&stype=0

Ljudi, uzeti kuke i motike u ruke i pravac na skupstinu, ko je uvezao GMO, Ivana Dulic-Markovic, lepo je zavezemo odvezemo na sud, pozvati sudiju, sudija presudi i lepo je mi odvezemo u zavtvor, drugacije ne vredi.

Ja ne razumem kako se drugacije boriti sem silom.

Сваки глас за ДС и СНС је глас за даљи увоз ГМО !!!
Памет у главу, никада више немојте да дате глас проевропским странкама !

Koliko te placa SRS?

EU je zabranila uvoz GMO, kakve veze ima evropa sa GMO?

Текст који је био овде постављам на следећој страни.