Ne znam zasto je ova treca po redu fotka tako izasla, evo probacu ponovo samo nju

video sam ovaj, ovo si slikao sa Brankovog mosta, eno, vidi se beton-hala...

Radulac  , jes' vala; to u stvari alasi prave "Nevidljivi alas -1" ili skraceno "Nelas" . Strasno dobar camac kad se ide na stuku - ne moze stuka da ga primeti pa se ne plasi, vec grize, kidise ko pcela na cvet!

Evo sada i drugog, odnosno prvog americkog "littoral combat ship" projekta tj. LCS-1 firme Lockheed Martin (ne prave oni samo avione! ). Brod je nazavan "USS Freedom". Prilazem tekstove (na engleskom) sa nekim informacijama - naime, izgleda da je doslo negde 2007 do odlaganja gradnje LCS-3 i LCS-4 (takodje opet iste dve firme su trebale e po jedan primerak) bilo je tu rasprava, otkaza itd, ali sve jedno mornarica je samo reprogramirala tajming, i ne odustaje da se izradi oko 55 ovakvih plovila (koliko od kojih od ova dva projekta, ne znam).

"LCS No. 1 Underway at Last
The Navy’s first littoral combat ship, the Freedom (LCS 1), got underway for the first time on 28 July. The first ship of a program that seeks some 55 advanced technology ships for operations in coastal/littoral waters, the Freedom is being constructed on Lake Michigan by a team led by the Lockheed Martin Corp.
The Freedom and the competitive design, led by the Independence (LCS 2) built by a General Dynamics led team, are noteworthy in being more than a year behind schedule and costing more than twice as much as originally estimated. The contract cost of these ships was to be on the order of $220 million — plus the innovative “mission packages” that would be installed when they were ready for operations. The LCS 1 cost is now estimated at $550 million. And, it may be more before the ship is ready for delivery to the Navy later this year.

The delays and cost increases of the LCS program led to Secretary of the Navy Donald Winter cancelling the construction of LCS 3 and 4, to have been built by the Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics teams, respectively. The “mess” of the LCS program also led to the firing, reassignment, or resignation of several naval officers, including the Program Executive Officer for Ships, and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition).

Subsequently the LCS 5 and LCS 6 were also cancelled in 2007 as the Navy sought to restructure the overall program. Under current plans, the Navy will procure:


    FY 2008   1 LCS
    FY 2009   2 LCS
    FY 2010   3 LCS
    FY 2011   3 LCS
    FY 2012   4 LCS
    FY 2013   6 LCS


The Navy’s program goal still calls for some 55 of these ships. Each ship will have a set of container like modules and an MH-​​60 series helicopter plus unmanned vehicles (air, surface, and underwater), as well as associated surface craft in some configurations, that will comprise a mission package. In theory, these packages could be swapped between LCS hulls. Each LCS will have a core crew and a team of specialists will embark in each ship with the mission package.

At this time the Navy plans to procure 24 mine warfare packages (approximately $68 million each), 16 anti-​​submarine warfare packages ($42.3 million), and 24 surface warfare packages ($16.7 million). Thus, if all are procured, the Navy would have flexibility in swapping modules at U.S. ports or, if the packages are flown overseas, at forward ports.

After the Freedom and Independence complete their builder and sea trials, the Navy will decide wither to procure one or the other design, or a force mix of both designs.

The Freedom is now running builder trials, to be followed by Navy acceptance trails. The ship will displace 2,862 tons full load and is 378 feet long — the size of a corvette or small frigate. The Navy, of course, could not accept such mundane designations for an innovative ship concept, and invented the LCS designation.  Since the early 1940s “L” ships were landing ships (LSD, LSM, LST, etc.). Subsequently, from 1968–1969 all of the Navy’s larger amphibious ships — command ships, transports, cargo ships, and helicopter carriersc were also given “L” designations (LCC, LPA, LKA, LPH, LHA, etc.).

Thus, the LCS marks still another break with Navy designation procedures as well as with naval tradition. But then again, on several counts — both good and bad — the LCS concept itself is a break with tradition.

– Norman Polmar

Tu su i neke slicice, projekta, porinuca, gotovog broda i broda u voznji.

Sta je ovo na slici br 4?
Kakav je to talas??

Porinuce, mislim, sa strane, tako mi izgleda

Axa...
Zar se to ne radi na onim dokovima...Ne znam kako se zovu.Brod se radi,i kada bude gotov,onda se u taj dok pusti voda,i brod isplovi.Malo mi je cudno ovo,ubacivanje sa strane...

Suvi dok, mislim da on vise sluzi za popravke. Opet porinuca se rade uzduz a ne popreko al drugacije ne bi znao da objasnim sliku 

Uf...Nesto ne verujem da tankere od 150m ubacuju u vodu na drugi nacin sem suvog doka.Zamisli tanker bacis u vodu ovako sa strane,i on napravi cunami!

Salim se naravno!

Suvi dok je super stvar, ali je mnogo skuplji od klasicnih porinuca (uzduz) i bocnih porinuca koja se rade uglavnom za manja plovila. Sve je to odavno uobicajena praksa ali i poseban posao sto se tice proracuna itd, a sve je pocelo jednostavno, zdravom logikom, jos u anticko doba.

Koliko sam ja upucen u brodogradnju.A nisam nesto preterano,suvi dokovi se uvek koriste u izgradnju tankera,razaraca,nosaca aviona, uopste velikih brodova