Ko ti kaze da Apple dobija samo sporove u USA? Izgleda da nisi pratio desavanja tokom proteklih godinu dana. Bilo je zabrana na teritoriji cele EU za neke uredjaje (uglavnom tablete) u protekllih nekoliko meseci. Nije Apple glup. Znaju oni zasto tuzakaju Samsung.

Inace 90% ovih stvari koje su u linku koji sam postavio uopste nije bila pominjana u procesu. Ova kolekcija slika samo pokazuje koliko je Samsung bedan. Ako ti izmedju ostalog kopuras neke tako jednostavne stvari kao sto su kutija, adapter za struju, izgled konektora, aplikacije za poruke i diktafon onda si stvarno truba firma.

кад изађе ајфон 5 нека га сви туже који су пре њега имали резолуцију екрана од 4 инча...отприлике сви произвођачи

Pa nece imati 4 nego 3.97   

 

 

A pazite tek ovo ludilo. 

Bruce Willis may sue Apple over iTunes downloads

LONDON: Bruce Willis, who is more usually seen escaping from explosions and battling terrorists to save the world, has now taken to the considerably quieter world of the courtroom in his latest battle.

 The 57-year-old actor is said to be considering legal action against Apple over his desire to leave his digital music collection to his daughters.

 If he succeeds, he could benefit not just himself and his family but the millions who have purchased songs from Apple's iTunes Store.

 Willis has discovered that, like anyone who has bought music online, he does not actually own the tracks but is instead 'borrowing' them under a licence.

 Most purchasers do not bother to read the details of the terms and conditions they agree to when buying an album but the small print makes it clear that music bought through iTunes should not be passed on to others by the person originally downloading it.

 Since Willis has apparently spent thousands of dollars downloading music on to 'many, many iPods', he is keen to be able to hand it on legitimately to daughters Rumer, Scout and Tallaluh.

 While one approach is that he is reportedly considering is to ask his legal team to establish family trusts as the 'holders' of his downloaded music, another option is to support ongoing legal action in five US states to give downloaders more rights to do what they want with their music.

 However, the legal actions face immense difficulties thanks to the enormous powers Apple established for itself at the start of the digital music age.

 The technology giant can freeze the iTunes accounts of those it believes are passing on music to others and forbids the transfer of songs to MP3 players other than its own iPods.

 Similar problems apply to the digital books millions download to electronic reading devices such as Amazon's Kindle.

 "Lots of people will be surprised on learning all those tracks and books they have bought over the years don't actually belong to them. It's only natural you would want to pass them on to a loved one," the Daily Mail quoted Solicitor Chris Walton as saying.

 "The law will catch up, but ideally Apple and the like will update their policies and work out the best solution for their customers," Walton added.

Izvor

Ja tek sad procitao...ovaj komentar za tuzbe u drugim zemljama....

Pa nek samo skine te iste pjesme piratski

Salim se, stvarno im je slinavo rjesenje za pjesme na iTunesu. I treba da javne licnosti istupaju ovako.

-

Elem azijska tehnologija je bila i ostala zasnovana na kopiranju i jeftinoj radnoj snazi. Amerika je voljeli mi to ili ne centar inovacije (mada ima i kopiranja, i kod Appla)

Nisi u pravu, sve tužbe u EU su odbačene, u UK je Apple pukao sa tužbom, u DE je bio na kratko zabranjen Tab ali posle par nedelja je Apple izgubio i tu.


Ne razumem, Prada je imala iPhone izgled pre iPhone-a.

Vidim neke novine pisu kako ce Apple da tuzi i HTC. Steta sto Apple nije dovoljno glup da napravi takav potez. To bi tek bila komedija.

Nije Apple nista izgubio nego je Samsung uradio ono sto je morao. Modifikovao je svoje uredjaje pa je zabrana ukinuta. Neces valjda da ulazes stotine miliona na razvoj potpuno novih uredjaja koji ne krse patente kad za kratko vreme mozes da sredis stare. Tu je sve islo svojim tokom i Apple je dobio ono sto je hteo. Trajni ban svakako nije moguc.

A sto se Prade tice, niko ne spori da je ona izasla pre iPhone-a i da je to bio prvi telefon koji je preko cele prednje strane imao touchscreen, ali LG je odavno odustao od tuzbe. Zasto ne znam, ali sigurno postoji dobar razlog. Razvoj iPhone-a je poceo jos 2005 ako se ne varam. Moguce je da je LG uvideo kada je poceo da vrsi pripreme za tuzbu da zapravo nema nikakvu osnovu. Sigurno bi ih tuzili da imaju za sta. Moguce je da je razvoj iPhone-a zapravo poceo pre razvoja Prade pa su zato odustali. Ali to su sve spekulacije. LG je taj koji mora da odgovori na to pitanje.