Ih, bre... pa ovo je Burek...

Svaka druga je udata\zauzeta i peca okolo. 

A onda nastaje drama kada nepozeljni udvarac postane nasrtljiv.
Onda je manijak i voajer.

I naravno... sve su ljubomorne na nju. 

posto si napisao da se vec javio...a to je bilo pre mog posta...
pretpostavljam da to nisam ja...
a i napisao si neiskusan...
a ja sam neiskusan jedino u pederlucima i voajerizmu i slicnim bolestinama...i tako ce ostati...
a ostalo sve normalno sam x puta upraznjavao..i realno i vako elektronskim putem...
jesam tita mi...
ynaci...u opticaju su...

Hunab_Ku ...ne bi reko...
Orfanelin...djeluje mi suvise bistro za tako nesto....
gottago...ima pametnijeg posla....
KingCyborg..../trenira i pije steroide...i sprema se za takmicenje...
sergio ramos...sprema se za ligu sampiona i usput da osvoji titulu sa realom...
Raven_Claw3190900 ....kull previse za takva sranja...

sad ko je taj voajer...

trebas da kompromitujes i cure o kojima se tu radi.. i ja cu ti onda sve reci...



zezam s ja malko...

nemoyes protiv toga da se boris....jednostavno dozvoli sebi da ti se cisto jebe za takve stvari...
ne pridaji znacaj..znam da te vjerovatno boli i da ti smeta to....
ali ljudi  su ljudi...besposlen pop i jarice krsti..pa tako i taj ko god da je...
kad ne mozes da jebes..onda ne dozvoli ni da drugi jebe,..i to je to...

budale...

jednostavno ..natjeraj svoj kurac da te boli za to....
jer to nije vredno pomena... i samo mu jos dajes znacaj....

Fala zeko

Дангубимо једном на послу на тако ја и мој колеза Буги. Буги је био цар... интелигентан лик, зајебант, фаца и помало хакер у слободно време. И сад тако док нема посла ја блејим овде на Буреку а колеза Буги изиграва брокера... неки трип онлајн трговине акцијама нафте... на нафти је пуко после неке од америчких интервенција, на злату је био нешто ситно добар, а са сребром је баш лепо стајао... и тако док ја блејим на Буреку и млатим празну сламу колеза Буги гледа у неке рилтајм графике, губи очи претећи 17 дијаграма у исто време... и ја га зезам... шта бре ти имаш од тога... Каже он... е сине, док ти ту блејиш ево ја сам од јутрос убио 15 долара, до краја смене биће 25... а шта ти имаш од тог Бурека који курац?

Тад му нисам успео објаснити да ем пустим мозак на пашу и спрдам се с готивним ликовима, ем могу да лапрдам и озбиљним темама ... а да је приде овај форум невероватна студија људских карактера. И то онај фазон без да и реч кажеш ил питаш ил билошта... људи ће ти рећи о себи а тиме и о себи сличнима... много много тога. Нисам успео тад да објасним колези Бугију колико је то готивна ствар... ал и даље ценим да јесте.

А ценим и да ти Анеа грешиш силно... мада није ни битно.

Углавном... ова тема је прајслес 

 

E sad ...vidis sta pise...znaci to mora da bude neka osoba sa autoritetom...jel tako se postize zadovoljenje ega...zapravo osoba se na taj nacin uzbudjuje..i...pise jos da obavezno ima nekoga bliskog kome to moze sve da saopsti..ali da nije neko sa ulice...to je glupo...nego bas neko blizak...zanimljivo...sad cu da postavim samo da dodjem kuci...uglavnom slabije situirani...uvek u problemu sa finansijama...inace oni i tako van svega imaju ulogu posmatraca u zivotu...

Freud described and delineated the relationship between sexual gazing(scoptophilia) and self-dislplay and called these instincts voyerurism and exhibitionism.At thit time,he pointed out that scoptophillia at the onset of its activity is auto-erotic,it had indeed an objecet,but that object is the subject own body,and only later shifts,by the way of comparison from the self to others.Freud had said that the component instincts involve other people as objects.In the 1915 paper,he said that the subject looks at his own sexual organ or his own sexual organ is looked at by himself,then the subject looks at an extraneous object(scoptophilia-active) and his own sexual organ is looked at by another person (exhibitionism-passive)One changed into the other by reversal from active to passive and by a turning round on the subject.The preliminary phase of the scoptophilic instinct,when the subject’s own body is the object of the scoptophilia (autoerotic satisfaction),is narcissistic stage.

Dalje u tekstu se kaze da se javlja u ranoj mladosti...i da u nedostatku pravog objekta...prelazi u fetish...i da se zapravo covek zaljubljuje sam u sebe...odnosno svoj polni organ...i na taj nacin postize erekcija...u kasnijoj fazi...to prelazi u nemogucnost da se ima normalan odnos sa partnerom...

E sad zanimljivo bi znati...koji su uzroci za nastajanje tako neceg....

II. Pleasure in Looking/Fascination with the Human Form

A. The cinema offers a number of possible pleasures. One is scopophilia. There are
circumstances in which looking itself is a source of pleasure, just as, in the reverse
formation, there is pleasure in being looked at. Originally. in his Three Essays on
Sexuality, Freud isolated scopophilia as one of the component instincts of sexuality
which exist as drives quite independently of the erotogenic zones. At this point he
associated scopophilia with taking other people as objects, subjecting them to a
controlling and curious gaze. His particular examples center around the voyeuristic
activities of children, their desire to see and make sure of the private and the
forbidden (curiosity about other people's genital and bodily functions, about the
presence or absence of the penis and, retrospectively, about the primal scene). In
this analysis scopophilia is essentially active. (Later, in Instincts and their
Vicissitudes, Freud developed his theory of scopophilia further, attaching it initially to
pre-genital auto-eroticism, after which the pleasure of the look is transferred to
others by analogy. There is a close working here of the relationship between the
active instinct and its further development in a narcissistic form.) Although the
instinct is modified by other factors, in particular the constitution of the ego, it
continues to exist as the erotic basis for pleasure in looking at another person as
object. At the extreme, it can become fixated into a perversion, producing obsessive
voyeurs and Peeping Toms, whose only sexual satisfaction can come from watching,
in an active controlling sense, an objectified other.
At first glance, the cinema would seem to be remote from the undercover world of
the surreptitious observation of an unknowing and unwilling victim. What is seen of
the screen is so manifestly shown. But the mass of mainstream film, and the
conventions within which it has consciously evolved, portray a hermetically sealed
world which unwinds magically, indifferent to the presence of the audience,
producing for them a sense of separation and playing on their voyeuristic phantasy.
Moreover, the extreme contrast between the darkness in the auditorium (which also
isolates the spectators from one another) and the brilliance of the shifting patterns of
light and shade on the screen helps to promote the illusion of voyeuristic separation.
Although the fiIm is really being shown, is there to be seen, conditions of screening
and narrative conventions give the spectator an illusion of looking in on a private
world. Among other things, the position of the spectators in the cinema is blatantIy
one of repression of their exhibitionism and projection of the repressed desire on to
the performer.
B. The cinema satifies a primordial wish for pleasurable looking, but it also goes
further, developing scopophilia in its narcissistic aspect. The conventions of
mainstream film focus attention on the human form. Scale, space, stories are all
anthropomorphic. Here, curiosity and the wish to look intermingIe with a fascination
with likeness and recognition: the human face, the human body, the relationship
between the human form and its surroundings, the visible presence of the person in
the world. Jacques Lacan has described how the moment when a child recognises its
own image in the mirror is crucial for rhe constitution of the ego. Several aspects of
this analysis are relevant here. The mirror phase occurs at a time when the child's
physical ambitions outstrip his motor capacity, with the result that his recognition of
himself is joyous in that he imagines his mirror image to be more complete, more
perfect than he experiences his own body. Recognition is thus overlaid with
misrecognition: the image recognised is conceived as the reflected body of the self,
but its misrecognition as superior projects this body outside itself as an ideal ego,
the alienated subject. which, re-introjected as an ego ideal, gives rise to the future
generation of identification with others. This mirror-moment predates language for
the child.
Important for this article is the fact that it is an image that constitutes the matrix of
the imaginary, of recognition/misrecognition and identification, and hence of the first
articulation of the 'I' of subjectivity. This is a moment when an older fascination with
looking (at the mother's face, for an obvious example) collides with the initial
inklings of self-awareness. Hence it is the birth of the long love affair/despair
between image and self-image which has found such intensity of expression in film
and such joyous recognition in the cinema audience. Ouite apart from the extraneous
similarities between screen and mirror (the framing of the human form in its
surroundings, for instance), the cinema has structures of fascination strong enough
to allow temporary loss of ego while simultaneously reinforcing the ego. The sense of
forgetting the world as the ego has subsequently come to perceive it (I forgot who I
am and where I was) is nostagicallyreminiscent of that pre-subjective moment of
image recognition. At the same time the cinema has distinguished itself in the production
of ego ideals as expressed in particular in the star system, the stars
centering both screen presence and screen story as they act out a complex process
of likeness and difference (the glamorous impersonates the ordinary).
C. Sections II. A and B have set out two contradictory aspects of the pleasurable
structures of looking in the conventional cinematic situation. The first, scopophilic,
arises from pleasure in using another person as an object of sexual stimulation
through sight. The second, developed through narcissism and the constitution of the
ego, comes from identification with the image seen. Thus, in film terms, one implies
a separation of the erotic identity of the subject from the object on the screen (active
scopophilia), the other demands identification of the ego with the object on the
screen through the spectator's fascination with and recognition of his like. The first is
a function of the sexual instincts, the second of ego libido. This dichotomy was
crucial for Freud. AIthough he saw the two as interacting and overIaying each other,
the tension between instinctual drives and self-preservation continues to be a
dramatic polarisation in terms of pleasure. Both are formative structures,
mechanisms not meaning. In themselves they have no signification, they have to be
attached to an idealisation. Both pursue aims in indifference to perceptual reality,
creating the imagised, eroticised concept of the world that forms the perception of
the subject and makes a mockery of empirical objectivity. During its history, the
cinema seems to have evolved a particularillusion of reality in which this
contradiction between libido and ego has found a beautifully complementary
phantasy world. In reality the phantasy world of the screen is subject to the law
which produces it. Sexual instincts and identification processes have a meaning
within the symbolic order which articulates desire. Desire, born with language, allows
the possibility of transcending the instinctual and the imaginary, but its point of
reference continually returns to the traumatic moment of irs birth: the castration
complex. Hence the look, pleasurable in form, can be threatening in content, and it is
woman as representation/image that crystallises this paradox.

Valjda je ovo pomoglo....

volim i ja svoj spolni organ 

moze se to sazeti u par rijeci..ali ja cu malo opsirnije da kazem par stvari....za nevnik 

ljudi sa nedostatkom paznje...one intimne...paznje...us vojim zivotima...
 povremeno zapadnu u takvu krizu...
nadju tako nekoga da ispolje svoje nezadovoljstvine...

nerijetko isprovociraju exces...onda sebe postave u ulogu zrtve...
i traze saosjecanja od nekih blizih ljudi....da obavezno stanu na njihovu stranu...
i da im govore rijeci podrske i tako to....
ma ti si najbolji..najdrazi i tako.... na sta se sve debili loze....


sve u svemu to su  manipulatori i u sustini hinje...i pokvareni ljudi..
zato i jesu sami....
da je tu okej nesto u vezi takvih...
valjda bi za toliko godina..nasli makar jednu osobu suprotnog spola koja moze da ih trpi...
pa eto makar i na netu...
pa eto i na bureku....ovdje samo vrhunski debil ne moze da nadje srodnu dusu...
ili nekoga za bilo sta....vezano za paznju...

ynaci...toga ima koliko hoces....u zivotu takodjer a posebno na netu....

ne treba se samo uzrujavati...to su samo nikovi....koji su spas nasli u internet carstvu....
vole vazda da su u prvom nekom planu..
jer tako nadopunjavaju onu stranu u zivotu gdje su misevi i otiraci...i gdje ih ne jebe niko jedan posto....

i kad takav osjeti pretnju...i kad vidi da je neka njemu draga osoba i prema nekome drugom...
naklonjena..

ubrzo tu nastupa pljuvanje i omalovazavanje..drvlje i kamenje...
klasicna seljacka politika...

i ako se upuistis u tako nesto...sa takvim mentolima...velike su sanse da i ti takav postanes...
svaka igra se igra sa istom vrstom  rekvizita...ne mozes tenis igrati sa hokejaskom palicom... nego sa reketom...
urodjeno uzvracas istom mjerom i na isti nacin....

a to nije dobro....jer te uvuce debil u svoju igru....a tesko je igrati bilo sta sa debilima...

samo se nasmejes 
 i kazes mu  alo...papak.... sisaj mi kurac... i ides za svojim poslom...

 

Ti, kao prijatelj da mu pomognes? , Mozda, da ga nagovoris da ode kod psihijatra!!!!, ne sam, vec s tobom kao podrskom.Mozda da zajedno i udjete i ispricate njegov problem.Tako prijatelji rade..
E, sad ako je ovo trollovanje, sta reci.... .

matorog psa neces nikad nauciti nove trikove...
ne zato sto neumije da uci...
nego zato sto misli da zna sve trikove./..

elem evo mu jedna voajerska 

http://pl.memgenerator.pl/mem-image/daj-cmoka-pl-ffffff

 

...samo ja ovde ne vidim problem