"Хоћемо у Азију" - један од БГ графита

Onda ne EU ! 

ŠUTANOVAC: KOŠTUNICA DEZAVUIŠE JAVNOST


BEOGRAD , 3. maja (Tanjug) - Potpredsednik Demokratske stranke (DS) i ministar odbrane Dragan Šutanovac izjavio je danas da "premijer Vojislav Koštunica dezavuiše javnost kada tvrdi da u Sporazumu o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sa EU postoji klauzula kojom se od Srbije traži da prihvati nezavisnost Kosova".

Šutanovac je zapitao - "da li je moguće da su narodnjačkoj koaliciji, od politike koju je imala do pre godinu dana, ostale samo lažne optužbe i neistine".

On je novinarima u Beogradu, nakon potpisivanja Protokola DS-a i Nacionalne organizacije osoba sa invaliditetom, rekao i da je "ubeđen da postoji politička podrška" za lepljenje plakata sa likovima predsedika Srbije Borisa Tadica i potpredsednika Vlade Božidara Djelića na kojima je ispisano 'državni neprijatelji', koji su u petak osvanuli na nekim beogradskim ulicama.

"Ubeđen sam da postoji politička podrška tim plakatima, da postoji finansijer koji može da se pronađe preko policije i da policija u vrlo kratkom roku taj slučaj može da razreši", rekao je potpredsednik Šutanovac.

On je ocenio i da "unazad deset meseci u Srbiji vlada klima po kojoj se neki političatri nazivaju izdajnicima".

"Lično sam proglašen izdajnikom u danu kada sam rekao da ničiju decu neću slati u rat za Kosovo i Metohiju. Ta klima se deset meseci podizala na viši nivo i vrhunac je nastao u jednoj opštoj histeriji 'narodnjaka' i Srpske radikalne stranke, nakon potpisivanja sporazuma sa Evropom", zaključio je Šutanovac.

DJURIŠIĆ: D S S NASTAVLJA DA OBMANJUJE GRAĐANE SRBIJE


BEOGRAD , 3. maja (Tanjug) - Predsednik Izvršnog odbora Demokratske stranke Marko Djurišić izjavio je danas da Demokratska stranka Srbije (D S S) nastavlja da obmanjuje građane klevetama i napadima na predsednika Srbije Borisa Tadića i iznošenjem laži i neistina o potpisivanju Sporazuma o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju.

"Potpisivanje S S P bio je ne samo patriotski čin i zakonska obaveza, već i važan korak koji doprinosi boljem životu svih građana Srbije. Lagati da se time pokušava sakriti predaja Kosova je ne samo uvreda za predsednika Republike i potpredsednika Vlade, već za sve građane Srbije u čijem je direktnom interesu sprovođenje ovog Sporazuma", naveo je Djurišić.

On je reagovao na današnju izjavu portparola D S S-a Andreje Mladenovića po čijoj oceni se "od građana Srbije ne može sakriti činjenica da je predsednik Srbije Boris Tadić u Luksemburgu stavio pečat na predaju Kosova".

Djurišić je u izjavi dostavljenoj Tanjugu podsetio da je potpisivanje ovog Sporazuma bilo obavljeno u direktnom prenosu u svim domaćim medijima, a da je njegov sadržaj u potpunosti stavljen na uvid celokupnoj javnosti.

"Podsećam da je zahvaljujući potpisivanju S S P, za samo tri dana kragujevačka 'Zastava' potpisala ugovor sa 'Fijatom' čime je Srbija dobila 700 miliona evra novih investicija, otvoren je put ka ukidanju viza, a 200 naših najboljih studenata već je dobilo stipendije na prestižnim evropskim univerzitetima", rekao je Djurišić.

On ocenjuje da ovakvim napadima D S S "pokušava da zaustavi pozitivne korake koje je S S P omogućio i da sakrije činjenicu da je Pakt Šešelj-Koštunica stvarnost koja se svakodnevno manifestuje".

"Ovakvim javnim delovanjem, D S S je postala otvoreno antievropska stranka i najveći zagovornik izolacije Srbije", naveo je Durišić.

"Još jednom upozoravamo predstavnike D S S da prestanu da uznemiravaju javnost neistinama, klevetama i lažima i korišćenjem rečnika koji se ni u čemu ne razlikuje od jezika koji je doveo do tragičnih posledica i ubistva premijera Zorana Djinđića 2003. godine", zaključio je Djurišić.

Cemu taj fatalizam, ako ne EU onda propast.... pa EU ce sama propasti za desetak godina, jedva je drze na okupu....

Evo malo, cisto da se vise ne lazemo, da li EU smatra Kosmet delom Srbije ili ne, da li daje prezumpcije i ostalo sto zuti seru, da konacno se vidi sta je potpisano....



 Key findings of the progress reports on Kosovo and the potential candidate countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia
 
Reference:  MEMO/07/446    Date:  06/11/2007
 
     
HTML:    EN    FR    DE
PDF:      EN    FR    DE
DOC:     EN    FR    DE
 

MEMO/07/446

Brussels, 6 November 2007
Key findings of the progress reports on Kosovo[1] and the potential candidate countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia

Albania

Albania signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with the EU on 12 June 2006. An Interim Agreement has entered into force and SAA ratification by the Member States is ongoing.

Political criteria

Albania has made some progress on democracy and the rule of law. Some progress has also been achieved regarding human rights and the protection of minorities, and in strengthening property rights. Albania has continued to play a positive role in maintaining regional stability and has contributed to the conclusion of the regional free trade agreement, CEFTA.

However, democratic culture and in particular constructive dialogue between parties needs to be developed to enable the political system to function effectively and transparently. It is important for Albania to complete the long overdue electoral and judicial reforms which are currently being discussed. Corruption remains widespread.

Economic criteria

Albania has made progress towards establishing a functioning market economy. Further considerable reform efforts are needed to enable it to cope over the long term with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union. The level of registered unemployment, though still high, continued to decline. Privatisation gained new momentum in 2007.

However, external deficits widened further, mainly due to difficulties in the energy sector. Shortages of qualified staff and poor infrastructure - including energy supply - hold back the development of a private sector that can make sustained contribution to the country's economic development.

European standards

Albania has made progress in aligning its legislation, policies and capacity with European standards and is implementing its Interim Agreement trade commitments. In some areas, such as customs, competition and fighting organised crime, progress made in previous years has been sustained.

In other areas, however, such as energy, transport and intellectual property rights, progress has remained limited.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Negotiations on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with Bosnia and Herzegovina began in 2005. Discussions on the technical content of the foreseen Agreement were completed in December 2006. The conclusion of the SAA, however, depends on Bosnia and Herzegovina meeting four conditions: achievement of police reform in accordance with the EU's three principles[2], full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), public broadcasting reform, and public administration reform.

Political criteria

As regards the political criteria, Bosnia and Herzegovina's progress has slowed down. Some progress has been made in the area of public administration, but significant further efforts are needed. Co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has improved and is now at a generally satisfactory level. The country participates actively in regional co-operation and has agreed to the regional free trade agreement (CEFTA).

However, Bosnia and Herzegovina's political leaders failed achieve police reform. Lack of progress on this and other important issues is seriously delaying the conclusion of the SAA, as well as reforms in general. Full co-operation with the ICTY remains necessary.

Economic criteria

Bosnia and Herzegovina has made little further progress towards establishing a functioning market economy. The persistence of very high unemployment remains a major cause of concern. Major reforms are needed to enable it to cope over the long term with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union.

Economic growth remained high and accelerated. Inflation has been reduced. FDI increased significantly in 2007 and helped financing the external deficit. Price competitiveness was to a large extent preserved.

However, weak domestic consensus on the fundamentals of economic policy led to a slow-down of reforms both at entity and other levels of government. Significant structural rigidities hamper the functioning of the labour market. The public sector remains large.

European Standards

Bosnia and Herzegovina has made limited progress in aligning its legislation and policies with European standards. In areas such as, competition, transport, energy, education, visa management and asylum, some progress has been made.

In other areas, however, such as movement of persons, social policies and employment, little has been achieved.

Montenegro

A Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with Montenegro was signed on 15 October 2007. It provides a framework for further economic, political and institutional development, provided that the agreement is properly implemented.

Political criteria

Montenegro has made good progress in establishing the necessary legal framework and institutions following independence. In October, Parliament adopted a constitution broadly in line with European standards. It has continued making progress in administrative and legal reform. The main political parties adopted a declaration on the basic constitutional principles of rule of law committing that these principles would be incorporated into the Constitution. This allowed the admission of the country to the Council of Europe. There has been progress in establishing the necessary framework for respecting human rights and protection of minorities. Montenegro is committed to regional cooperation in South-East Europe and ratified the CEFTA agreement.

However, judicial reform is just beginning. Corruption is widespread. Public administration has to be significantly strengthened. The conditions of refugees and displaced persons, including Roma, give cause for concern.

Economic criteria

Montenegro has made further progress towards establishing a functioning market economy, though at a slower pace. Major reforms are needed to enable it to cope over the long term with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union.

Macroeconomic stability improved. The rapid economic growth helped create jobs while inflation remained subdued. Large foreign direct investments supported economic activity. A prudent fiscal policy was pursued, resulting in a continued budget surplus. Trade openness and the alignment process with WTO rules supported further economic integration with the EU.

However, there are still some risks to macroeconomic stability. Energy prices increased substantially. The very high growth of consumer credit and of asset prices signalled widening macroeconomic and financial imbalances. Though unemployment declined, it remained high. Increasing labour costs continued to erode the country's competitiveness.

European standards

The country has made some progress in alignment with European standards and in strengthening its administrative capacity, leading to the signature of the SAA with the EU. Good progress was achieved in areas such as customs and taxation, competition, public procurement, free movement of capital, and agriculture.

However, progress remained limited in social and employment policies, energy, environment as well as justice, freedom and security. Montenegro needs to continue to improve its legal, political and administrative capacity to ensure a successful implementation of the SAA.

The Commission has decided to establish its Delegation in Podgorica with the aim to have it operational by end-2007.

Serbia

Serbia made significant progress in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) negotiations. In June 2007 Serbia met the conditions and resumed SAA negotiations, which had been previously suspended in May 2006. Technically, the negotiations have been finalised. However, the conclusion of the Agreement continues to depend on full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, which should lead to the arrest and transfer of all remaining fugitives to The Hague.

Political criteria

Serbia has made some progress in addressing political criteria. The new constitution entered into force in November 2006. A constitutional law has also been adopted. Parliamentary elections took place in January 2007, in accordance with international standards. However, the period until the formation of a new government in May 2007 highlighted sharp political divisions. This led to a slow-down in the pace of reforms. The new government has made efforts to step up the reform process Civilian oversight of the military has improved. Serbia has played a positive role in improving regional co-operation.

Serbia participated in discussions under the auspices of the UN Secretary General's Envoy for Kosovo on the future status of Kosovo and continues to do so under the auspices of the international troika.

However, judicial reform is lagging behind and a new legal framework is pending. Corruption is widespread. Enforcement of human rights, including women's, children and Roma rights needs to be improved. Ethnic tensions still exist. Serbia must now achieve full co-operation with the ICTY. It should lead to the arrest and transfer of all remaining indictees to the Hague Tribunal in order to formally conclude the SAA negotiations. Serbia also needs to show a more constructive approach towards the participation of Kosovo under UNSCR 1244 in regional cooperation and other fora.

Economic criteria

Serbia has made some progress towards establishing a functioning market economy. Further reform efforts must be pursued to enable Serbia to cope in the medium term with the competitive pressures and market forces within the Union.

The broad economic policy essentials have overall been maintained. The economy continued to expand strongly. Foreign capital inflows remained significant. Inflation declined, the budget remained in surplus and expenditures were directed towards investment. Foreign trade and investment continued to grow and economic integration with the EU has advanced.

However, unemployment remains very high. Further progress in privatisation is needed and a competitive and dynamic private sector has not yet been fully established. Fiscal policy became less tight. The lack of flexibility in the labour market and high social security contributions remain an obstacle for job creation, just like bureaucratic requirements and complex legislation.

European standards

The SAA negotiations have shown that Serbia has the administrative capacity to progress towards the EU. Serbia is well placed to implement a future SAA. Good progress was achieved in areas such as free movement of goods, customs and taxation, Industry and SME, agriculture and visa facilitation.

However progress has been limited in areas like information society and media, financial control and money laundering.

Kosovo (under UN Security Council Resolution 1244)

Kosovo's institutional arrangements are governed by United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1244 establishing an interim international civilian administration (UNMIK). The constitutional framework divides responsibilities between UNMIK and the provisional institutions of self-government (PISG), pending a final settlement.

Political criteria

Despite negotiations on the status, overall stability is being maintained. The provisional institutions of self-government have fulfilled their core roles in their area of competence. The assembly has participated more actively in the legislative process with improved law making capacity and a better administration. Coordination within the government has improved.

Kosovo participated in discussions under the auspices of the UN Secretary General's Envoy for Kosovo on the future status of Kosovo and continues to do so under the auspices of the international troika.

However, the status issue has continued to dominate Kosovo's politics. UNMIK still bears ultimate legislative and executive responsibility. Relations between Kosovo Albanians and Kosovo Serbs remained strained. Strengthening the rule of law, anti-corruption policy, enforcement of human rights and the fight against organised crime and enhancing the dialogue between the communities represent major challenges. Corruption remains widespread.

Economic criteria

Kosovo has made little progress towards establishing a functioning market economy. Further considerable reform efforts must be pursued to enable it to cope over the long term with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union.

Overall, economic policies remained broadly sound and market-oriented. Inflation was low, and the price level of domestic goods and services fell. Privatisation of formerly socially owned enterprises accelerated significantly although much remains to be done. The financial sector further expanded and consolidated in a context of increased foreign ownership.

However, growth was relatively modest and unemployment very high. Inadequate implementation of the rule of law, status related uncertainties and fiscal risks continued to affect the functioning of market mechanisms and the business climate. Economic policy co-ordination remained weak making it difficult to ensure a policy consensus and to respect policy commitments.

European standards

Kosovo has made further progress in approximating its legislation and policies with European standards. In some areas, such as customs and free movement of goods, progress made in previous years has been sustained.

However, little progress has been made on the effective implementation and enforcement of legislation. More efforts are needed to create the administrative capacity that will ensure further approximation and implementation of European standards, in particular in fighting organised crime, protecting the external borders and boundary, taxation and energy.


Izvor

A ovo je neka radionica o putu Kosmeta ka clanstvu u EU, naravno kao nezavisne drzave...

Pu PDF file na izvoru.....


THE QUESTION OF KOSOVO: FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTORATE TO A REDEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT
1
Bourgogne Balkans Express with the support of Sciences Po
WORKSHOP
THE QUESTION OF KOSOVO:
FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTORATE
TOA REDEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL
ENGAGEMENT
Bourgogne Balkans Express (Association loi 1901) organizes this workshop sponsored by the North Atlantic Treaty
Organisation, The European Commission, Sigma Insurance Group, E2L Consulting, Courrier International, Le Monde,
Le Courrier des Balkans and Le Bien Public.
THE QUESTION OF KOSOVO: FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTORATE TO A REDEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT
2
OVERVIEW
Nowadays, a workshop on Kosovo represents more than just the issue of a region leaving an
interethnic conflict. Almost ten years after the military intervention of NATO in 1999, the question on the
status of Kosovo has reached an unprecedented scale and exceeds the Balkans’ framework. Since the last
EU enlargement in early 2007, the region is bordered by the European Union without being a part of it.
Thus, the EU is strongly encouraged to take over the responsibility for the future of the region, especially
for Kosovo.
However, is the international community ready to provide a newly expected institutional support in
such an instable region? To answer this question, we would like to embed the workshop into the current
debate on a possible transfer of the mission and expertise of UNMIK over to the responsibility of the EU in
order to analyze the responsibilities and challenges of a special mission of the European Union in Kosovo.
GLOBAL OBJECTIVE
The goal of the workshop is to organize a conference reuniting politicians and researchers for a
genuine exchange of ideas, information and political visions on the future of Kosovo in order to discuss
possible solutions for the new challenges of the region. The project also intends to integrate this debate
into the academic and scientific context of Sciences Po through a final publication, that we are going to
publish and that will be distributed both in Kosovo among the researchers and experts interested in the
subject as well as in France and in Belgium also among researchers, students of Sciences Po and EU
experts that might be interested in the subject. The final publication could become a part of the publications
of the “Maison d’Edition des Presses de SciencesPo” and would strengthen the academic interest in the
topic in general.
ORGANISATION
The workshop will be opened by a welcome address of the European Commission Director for the
Western Balkans of the DG Enlargement, Mr. Pierre Mirel and the President of the Burgundy Region, Mr.
François Patriat.
It will be held on 6th of May 2008 at the campus sites of Sciences Po, Dijon. This institution is
specialized in the study of Central and Eastern Europe, welcoming around 100 students from over 25
different countries.
The conference will unite 18 speakers (see list below), with six of them coming from the Balkans, and will
be organized around three round table discussions addressing the following topics:
- International implications
- Minorities and nationalisms
- Interregional and transnational cooperation
Every round table discussion will be open to the students of Sciences Po and to the general public. The
round table discussions will last four hours and will follow the subsequent structure:
- Every round table will be organized around four panels lasting one hour,
- Every round table will unite seven participants, three researchers, three practitioners and one
moderator,
- Every panel will be composed of an oral presentation of 20 minutes and a debate of 40 minutes.
THE QUESTION OF KOSOVO: FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTORATE TO A REDEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT
3
ROUND TABLES
1. International Implications:
o The impact of the status of Kosovo on international relations:
.. The American, Russian and European perspectives: the challenges for international
law/relations with regard to the question of Kosovo
o The relations between EU and Serbia :
.. The Serbian path: between European integration and national isolation?
o Managing the transition from the UNMIK towards a mission of the EU:
.. Governance under international trusteeship: The absence of a unique European
representation (ICO/EUSR, ESDP, EC) and the multitude of the international
organisations working in Kosovo: between complementarity and competition.
o The risk of a domino effect: a precedent at the regional and international level?
.. What lessons can be learnt for the future developments of the CFSP with regard to
its application in Bosnia, Macedonia and the region of Presevo?
2. Minorities and nationalisms
o The protection of minorities in the Ahtisaari plan:
.. The rights of minorities as provided in the Ahtisaari plan – improvements,
insufficiencies and risks.
o What “multi ethnic society” for Kosovo?
.. What definition of multi-ethnicity and what projects in order to avoid another ethnic
conflict and the deterioration of the relationships between the different ethnic groups
in the future. Is there a need for an Erasmus project in the Balkans or for the creation
of a Council of the Balkans?
o The socio-economic approach as a means of stabilization in the region of Kosovo:
.. The respect of the rights of minorities through economic cooperation: how to ensure
the transition from the perception of “an external constraint” to an action initiated and
supported by the population? The micro credit, a single market for the Balkans, etc.:
possible tools for enforcing interdependency?
o Reconsider the history of the region in order to encourage cohesion:
.. Does a peaceful coexistence depend on a redefinition and promotion of a commonly
accepted perception of history?
3. Interregional and trans-national cooperation
o Intergovernmental police cooperation:
.. How to avoid that Kosovo turns into a « narco-state » by favouring a generalized
fight against organized crime?
o Trans-regional cooperation and local democracy:
.. What kind of collaboration between the border line minorities (ex: the valley of
Presevo and the North of Mitrovica) and their national States?
o The economic cooperation:
.. Is a European economic « spillover » imaginable in the Balkans? The Balkan
economic market: between integration and fragmentation.
o The political cooperation:
.. Is there a Balkan political voice within tomorrow’s Europe defending common
interests? Is there an accepted way of promoting these interests?
THE QUESTION OF KOSOVO: FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTORATE TO A REDEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT
4
DETAILED ORGANISATION
Hour Event
9h30 - 10h30
Welcome address
11h00 - 13h00 Round tables:
o International Implications:
- The impact of the status of Kosovo on international relations
- The relations between the EU and Serbia once the status of Kosovo has
been defined
o Minorities and nationalisms
- The status of minorities in the Ahtisaari plan
- Under which conditions is a multi ethnic society viable?
o Interregional and trans-national cooperation
- Intergovernmental police cooperation
- Trans-regional cooperation and local democracy
14h30 - 16h30 Round tables:
o International Implications:
- Managing the transition from the UNMIK towards a mission of the EU
- The risk of a domino effect
o Minorities and nationalisms
- The economic approach as a means of stabilization in the region
- The existence of a commonly accepted history encouraging cohesion
o Interregional and trans-national cooperation
- The economic cooperation
- The political cooperation
16h30 - 17h
Coffee break with the students
17h - 18h30 Debate with both a Serbian and a Kosovarian participant (opened to the
general public)
CONTACT
Akil KRAJA
Student at Sciences Po (Master),
International Public Management
akil.kraja@sciences-po.org
Martin Chatel
Student at Sciences Po (Master),
International Public Management
martin.chatel@sciences-po.org

Izvor

Ocemo li jos malo da pricamo o tome sta EU misli i da li ima "neutralan" stav....

EDIT:

Evo i malo slicica da vidimo taj "neutralan" stav....




Zeleno:   zemlje kandidati

Zuto: potencijalne zemlje kandidati   ... (jasno se primecuje da je Kosmet oznacen kao posebna drzava a ne kao deo Srbije, sto daje jasnu "prezumpciju" stava EU oko pitanja Kosova.....)

Dakle, ocemo jos oko toga sta EU stvarno misli.....

Наравно да је тешко толику живину држати на окупу, зато Е.У. из дана у дан постаје тоталитарна супер-држава, по узору на Хитлерову Немачку и Совјестски Савез.
Наши европејци никада нису посматрали како фунционише европски парламент, а о томе постоје документарци.

Али надајмо се да ће америчка економија наставити да посрће, што ће се одразити на Е.У.
И надајмо се да ће непријатељи наставити са условљавањима, макар то били измишљени услови попут хапшења генерала Младића и не знам кога још...

п.с. сваки трећи Немац жали за маркама.

Ništa se ti ne brini Srbija će uvek biti korak ispred SAD i EU, bar kada je u pitanju
totalitarizam i propast privrede  čim dođu radikalni na vlast

I skini tog tuđeg predsednika i zastavu iz potpisa, ovo je Srbija
a ne Rusija

@system_V_r4


Mozda treba ovaj plakat da stavi u potpis da bi ti se svideo-mlogo je  leeeeeeeeep !!!!!!!!!
Ovo je srpska stvarnost - pa makar  mnogima se ne svidjala.