koji put se srecem sa ovim pitanjem

"Evolucija je...

...teorija i činjenica. često se može čuti tvrdnja da “evolucija nije dokazana, jer da jeste, onda bi bila zakon evolucije, a ne teorija evolucije”. U svakodnevnom govoru, ljudi koriste reč “teorija” da označe neku maglovitu ideju koju imaju o nekoj stvari ili događaju. U nauci reč “teorija” označava sistem objašnjenja, model koji najbolje odgovara svim činjenicama. Reč “zakon” označava kratku formulu ili definiciju neke naučne činjenice.
    Otud imamo Teoriju Gravitacije, Mikrobiološku Teoriju Bolesti, i Teoriju Evolucije. Teorija evolucije je jedna od najbolje dokazanih ideja u modernoj nauci, i predstavlja kamen temeljac moderne biologije, biohemije i medicine."

Imaš li ti neki problem u životu?!   Otkud to tebi da sam ja neobrazovan??


Ovo 'nepismeni' ću da shvatim kao uvredu, pa ću u skladu s tim i da diskutujem sa tobom, 'sveznalico'? Sa 5 (pet) postova daješ sebi pravo da me nazivaš nepismenim i neznalicom.  

Tebi je evolucija činjenica zato što na sajtu 'Teorija evolucije' tako piše... Kakav šampion...

Vama dvojici novajlija bi neko od moderatora trebalo da objasni pravila lijepog ponašanja na ovom forumu, a nekima ne bi bio na odmet ni pokoji čas iz pravopisa, pošto pokazujete znake nepismenosti...

@Predrag
Ja imam vise postova od tebe, jel mogu ja da te vredjam 

Buci, buci, ne prolaze ti bezobrazne laži i prevare pa hajmo pozivati moderatore u pomoć?!?!?

Da nije tužno bilo bi smešno... Ako hoćeš da lupetaš neobrazovane debilne gluposti na javnom forumu onda budi spreman na adekvatne kritike, argumente i dokaze protiv tih lupetanja...

Kao na primer sada, to što si citirao nije nepismenost nego običan i veoma normalan i čest typo... look it up...

Da li si pročitao svaki moj post na ovu temu, pa tako pričaš? Uključio si se na temu prije pola sata i misliš da si pokupio svu pamet svijeta zato što si pročitao sadržaj jednog evolucionističkog sajta?? Uz to, još i vrijeđaš?
Katastrofa...


Kako hoćeš, ali mislim da bi trebali da diskutujemo, a ne da zovemo jedni druge: 'debilu', 'tuko' i sl. Ovaj rookie mi stavi link prema nekom sajtu i bez ijednog argumenta me naziva nepismenim. Dobro bi bilo da poraste. Dotle... 

Nisam pročitao svaki tvoj post kao što i nisam odgovorio na svaki tvoj post. Pročitao sam jedan u kome koristiš tri standardna kreacionistička debilna kvazi-argumenta i to je više nego dovoljno da zaključim da si tužno neobrazovan. Takodje sam odgovorio na ta tri argumenta i pokazao u samo par rečenica koliko su glupi i neistiniti.

Tvoja neobrazovanost se takodje potvrdjuje tvojim plakanjem i pozivanjem moderatora i bežanjem od činjenica i od razbijenih gluposti koje si odvalio.

A već treći ili četvrti put odvaljuješ glupe i neistinite zaključke o meni kao što je ova glupost da sam "pročitao jedan evolucionistički sajt"... Nemaš pojma, čak ne bi mogao ni da shvatiš, koliko knjiga na ovu temu sam pročitao, ali opušteno odvaljuješ procenu i praviš se prepametan...

Istina je najčešće uvredljiva onima koji joj se suprotstavljaju...

[Off topic obrisan]

@demandred2390

Bez vredjanja.

Kao što rekoh, to što nisam gubio vreme na baš ovom forumu već na mnogim drugim samo nekome ko nema trunku argumenta i pokušava da beži od istine može da bude pokazatelj znanja i obrazovanosti...

Stvarno postaje tužno tvoje bežanje od teme...

Ok.  Evo da probam bez vredjanja!
Naucna teorija:
"A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts.  A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.

A scientific theory is a type of inductive theory, in that its content (i. e.  empirical data) could be expressed within some formal system of logic whose elementary rules (i. e.  scientific laws) are taken as axioms.  In a deductive theory, any sentence which is a logical consequence of one or more of the axioms is also a sentence of that theory. "

a razlika izmedju hipoteze, teorije i zakona:
"Scientific Law: This is a statement of fact meant to describe, in concise terms, an action or set of actions.  It is generally accepted to be true and universal, and can sometimes be expressed in terms of a single mathematical equation.  Scientific laws are similar to mathematical postulates.  They don’t really need any complex external proofs; they are accepted at face value based upon the fact that they have always been observed to be true.

Specifically, scientific laws must be simple, true, universal, and absolute.  They represent the cornerstone of scientific discovery, because if a law ever did not apply, then all science based upon that law would collapse.

Some scientific laws, or laws of nature, include the law of gravity, Newton's laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics, Boyle's law of gases, the law of conservation of mass and energy, and Hook’s law of elasticity.

Hypothesis: This is an educated guess based upon observation.  It is a rational explanation of a single event or phenomenon based upon what is observed, but which has not been proved.  Most hypotheses can be supported or refuted by experimentation or continued observation.

Theory: A theory is what one or more hypotheses become once they have been verified and accepted to be true.  A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by detached groups of researchers.  Unfortunately, even some scientists often use the term "theory" in a more colloquial sense, when they really mean to say "hypothesis. " That makes its true meaning in science even more confusing to the general public.

In general, both a scientific theory and a scientific law are accepted to be true by the scientific community as a whole.  Both are used to make predictions of events.  Both are used to advance technology.

In fact, some laws, such as the law of gravity, can also be theories when taken more generally.  The law of gravity is expressed as a single mathematical expression and is presumed to be true all over the universe and all through time.  Without such an assumption, we can do no science based on gravity's effects.  But from the law, we derived the theory of gravity which describes how gravity works, what causes it, and how it behaves.  We also use that to develop another theory, Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, in which gravity plays a crucial role.  The basic law is intact, but the theory expands it to include various and complex situations involving space and time.

The biggest difference between a law and a theory is that a theory is much more complex and dynamic.  A law describes a single action, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena.  And, whereas a law is a postulate that forms the foundation of the scientific method, a theory is the end result of that same process. "