Ja se ubih da nadjem snimak gde on to govori ili bilo koji pouzdaniji izvor o tome (dakle kurir otpada)
i nista... 

Живела породица Милошевић !!!
Живела победа !!!

Ajde?

Pa nigde ne moze da se nadje ni snimak kada je Djindjic popio jaje u glavu na Trgu republike, pa to ne znaci da ga isto nije strefilo i to bas po sred glave. Sve je to lepo sklonjeno, vuk pojeo magarca, nema niceg na netu, znaci da ga nije ni bilo. (trazi malo bolje, tipa djindjic calls NATO itd)

---

Pristalice SRS spalile zastave NATO, EU, SAD i Kosova

BEOGRAD, 24. marta 2015. (Beta) - Nekoliko stotina pristalica Srpske radikalne stranke koji su se u utorak okupili ispred zgrade nekadašnjeg Generalštaba u Beogradu obeležavujući 16. godišnjicu početka NATO bombardovanja spalilo je zastave NATO-a, Evropske unije, SAD i Kosova.

Obraćajući se okupljenima, lider radikala Vojislav Šešelj kazao je da Srbija nikad ne sme da postane članica NATO-a niti Evropske unije, iako "izdajnički režim (premijera Srbije) Aleksandra Vučića radi na tome".

"Hteli smo simbolično da ovim skupom obeležimo početak agresije, a režim je taj skup zabranio. Vučićev režim je kao krezuba veštica, rado bi ujela, ali nema zube, zato danas ni nema policajaca, a bili smo spremni da nas hapse i batinaju", rekao je Šešelj.

Kako je ocenio, svaki režim u Srbiji od petog oktobra 2000. godine predstavljao je "NATO pešadiju koja je pljačkala zemlju, a kada je njima nestalo snage nato je poslao izdajnike naprednjake da dovrše ono što je započelo bombardovanje".

Učesnici skupa koji nose zastave Srbije, Srpske radikalne stranke, Rusije uputili su se ka Terazijama.

Skup nije obezbedjivala policija, a saobraćaj u centru grada se normalno odvija.

Izvor: BETA

---

Inace, koga pljujemo na ovoj temi? Milosevica, Blera ili Vucica? 

Neki lazljivi Srbin napisao  

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/14/serbia.comment


A mogu i da prevedem 

Naslov je vise nego simptomatican ups simpatican 

“Beogradski kvisling”

Слободан Милошевић је неупоредиво,али недвосмислено кристално јасно, бољи Државник него сва ова номенклатура од 2000-те па на овамо-па да сви на гомилу да стану.

Докосуриће нас ова тренутна демонократска пошаст-ја кад вам кажем.

Emir Kusturica: Ni za suvu šljivu

TEORETIČAR šoka Džefri Saks je mislio da bi tranzicija trebalo da traje 20 godina.
Slobo je izdržao deceniju, pa je bombardovan. Zapad je onda u našu svakodnevicu pustio omamljujuću tečnost, ona se ovde prelivala kroz nečije prste, mahom kroz NVO. Tako su neki domaći, u ime borbe za poštenje, zastupali interese nepoštenih iz inostranstva.

Posle sloma Miloševićevog režima, u toj saradnji sa Zapadom, ništa do danas nije urađeno u korist građana Srbije. Za vreme Obrenovića smo izvozili svinje, kada smo bili dobri sa Amerikancima pred Prvi svetski rat, dugove smo vraćali - u suvim šljivama. Zato je današnje pitanje, da li je Srbija suverena država?

Svi potezi koji se vuku od Miloševićevog sloma, ne govore nam da iza njih stoji interes naše države. Mi se usklađujemo sa tuđim šemama. Lično mislim da put u Evropu nije dobar, jer on u svom najboljem izdanju, od ovakvog srpskog potencijala može samo da napravi usku stazicu, kojom teško živi možemo proći, i kao narod preostati.

Taj Saks, koji je zagovarao tezu da u roku od tri godine treba slomiti svaku državu sa viškom društvene svojine, od zagovornika šok tranzicije - postao je njen protivnik! Vidite, dvadeset godina je trebalo Južnoj Koreji da postane moćna, a to je bilo moguće samo uz kontrolu države. Kod nas je, nažalost, prvo slomljena država, pa je onda uništeno privredno blago. Sve to sprovele su neoliberalne partije, Srbiji nalepljene, one nemaju nikakvo istorijsko, kulturno, ekonomsko ni bilo kakvo drugo uporište u našoj zemlji, da bi njihova politika mogla biti uspešna...

www.novosti.rs

 

Ok, i gde pise da je on pozivao na bombardovanje?   Mislim, sve to ja razumem i ne bi me ni iznenadilo ali svi zivi citiraju tu izjavu, a ja nikako da je stvarno vidim. I tamo u tom klipu sto je Arijada postavila, nema toga ali u opisu autor je naveo kako je uklonjen ili tako nesto. Dakle sve se svodi na verovanje. Uopste ne zelim da ulazim u to da li je kvinsling ili mafijas ili nesto trece. Iteresuje me bas ta izjava.

U pravu si Crowz, nije mi palo na pamet na engleskom da trazim, kontao sam da je to mnogo popularniji snimak kod nas kada ga vec svi citiraju  

Edit: Evo nesto sto sam uspeo da nadjem ovako na brzinu.

Neki intervju, nemam pojma koliko je pouzdan izvor.

What is your opinion of the NATO bombing campaign?

Absolutely, it was a tragic event. I was surprised that the Serbian opposition survived that. My expectation was that after the NATO bombing it would take five years to have a Democratic opposition again. Fortunately it didn't, but it was designed absolutely to mobilize people's support around Milosevic. We don't have any case in history that after this kind of intervention, a dictator is weaker. This type of intervention makes dictators stronger because the people feel that it is an attack against their country. And they are not sophisticated [enough] to find out who is to blame.

They see bombs, and the bombs are American bombs, and the Americans bombed us, and it means that we are victims. Milosevic was president at this time. It means we must support our president to protect our country. That is normal, normal people do think in this way.

And this bombing didn't have any strategy. It wasn't part of a plan. It was the wrong estimation that Milosevic will accept an agreement after three days of bombing. He didn't accept and after that it was an [open-ended] game. Nobody knew what would happen after a hundred days of bombing or two hundred days of bombing. It was like Iraq. We will bomb and see what will happen.

And fortunately, we survived as opposition, but it was a miracle. It was not normal. It was not logical. And ironically the people from the Western countries tried to convince us that the bombing helped us. It [was] aid to the Serbian Democratic forces — to bomb Serbia and to bomb bridges and to bomb buses and to bomb factories? It [was] stupid.

And in the cities with opposition governments — Novi Sad, Nis, Cacak, Kragujevac — there were bombs. In Pozarevac, Milosevic's city, a symbol of Milosevic, not one bomb. I don't want to say that they should bomb Pozarevac. But it was very ironic to bomb Nis, a city with 60% of votes for the opposition in '96, a mayor who is Vice President for the Democratic Party, a poor city against Milosevic with 50 bombs in 50 days.

I don't understand the reason, but I don't think they had strategy. That it was just without [a clear] idea, just to continue and not to have resolution. Just to hope something [would] happen. It is kind of Milosevic's politics. To start something and to hope something will happen.

http://www.aforcemorepowerful.org/films/bdd/story/hif/zoran-djindjic.php

Serbian television has accused opposition leaders of selling out to Nato in pursuit of their own presidential ambitions.

The main televison evening news continued its rallying call to the nation by talking about what it called the resistance and unity of the Serbian people in the face of the continuing air raids.

The TV said Nato's military machine had "no answer" to the people's resistance, unity and concord in the defence of their country, nor was there any weapon or bomb able to destroy that spirit.
Kosovo: Special Report    

It went on to attack Serbian opposition leaders Zoran Djindjic and Vuk Obradovic who, it said, had been abandoned by their supporters and were now encouraging Nato to continue bombing Serbia.

The "monsters in the Pentagon and Nato" were "contemplating day and night how they could destroy our unity and resolve to defend the country from the occupier by political means", the TV commented.

"They cannot figure out what has become of the so-called democratic opposition, which sauntered along the streets of Belgrade two years ago under the American and German flags".

Nato and US leaders had been reluctantly forced to acknowledge that even sympathisers of opposition parties had rallied round the Serbian people defending their homeland.

The TV said: "Some leaders of the so-called democratic opposition, having returned from the big wide world, have suddenly found themselves in local, Podgorica-styled shelters, as Zoran Djindjic has, ready to offer their democratic services when Nato concludes its bombing democracy, and, if need be, even to take over the helm of the country.

"According to Djindjic, the solution to the Yugoslav crisis is to deploy Nato troops in the province, while, with the return of refugees, the Serbs ought to be tried for war crimes.

"It will take only the next two or three weeks to achieve this, meaning, actually, that it will take the dropping of another 10,000 tonnes of explosive on the Serbian heads, including the heads of the voters of Djindjic's Democratic Party."

'Made-in-Rambouillet agression'

Vuk Obradovic, leader of the Social Democrats, had been "no less cooperative" and would be "equally glad to see Nato troops in Kosovo," the TV said.

"These people, acting as a sort of electronic beacon, and realising that the war is nearing an end, are recommending themselves for some future time, both to the West and to our people."


[ image: Vuk Obradovic rejected Serb TV's attack]
Vuk Obradovic rejected Serb TV's attack
"These specimens of our fifth column do not find the Rambouillet quasi-accords and its military annex to be unacceptable, nor do they oppose even the section that empowers Nato to not only occupy Kosovo, but also the whole of Yugoslavia as well.

"But Nato does not have our signature for this made-in-Rambouillet aggression from the air and on the ground, despite the assistance and support it enjoys from these local electronic beacons, who are so insignificant for our people and history that they are written off in advance, nor will it ever get our signature."

Mr Djindjic had called for another three weeks of bombing, the TV said, by which time he believed the country would be totally destroyed.

"At the same time, he puts himself forward for the office of Yugoslavia's president. Is the destruction of Yugoslavia his platform and price he is willing to pay for the presidential candidacy?"

But Vuk Obradovic rejected Serbian TV's attack. According to Podgorica radio in neighbouring Montenegro, Mr Obradovic described the TV commentary as "an invitation to a witch hunt and a call for the elimination of people who think differently".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/monitoring/338294.stm

(ovo drugo nisam stigao da procitam do kraja ali koliko vidim govori o propagandi medija...)

Nemam vremena sad da trazim ali po secanju cini mi se da je izjava bila za DW njihov radio program...pokusaj tako...

Hocu (iako u onom Arijadinom videu kazu da je bilo na tv-u ali nema veze )

никад не заборави