10 This Trial Chamber knows that the problem of identification is a

11 very significant one. The Prosecution pointed that out as well, and

12 rightly so. Namely, that we have to be extremely cautious when

13 identifying somebody in order not to harm somebody, especially not one of

14 the accused.

15 Witness P-030 was perhaps misled by the movie called 100 Days of

16 Vukovar when a different person was shown and the name Miroslav Radic was

17 constantly attributed to that person, and that was a different person in

18 that footage. Perhaps Witness P-030 had to state that before the Trial

19 Chamber because, and we mustn't forget that he was one of the persons that

20 was subjected to special investigation by Croatian secret police, SIS. I

21 think that Exhibit 300 deals with this. This exhibit was adduced. And

22 let me repeat here that this secret Croatian service managed to acquire

23 information, secret information, from this OTP, and OTP should be

24 concerned about this. They used this information in order to prepare some

25 witnesses, including Witness P-030, and naturally somebody had to confirm

Page 16186

1 the allegations in this hastily assembled indictment. They didn't manage

2 to do this in the end. I think that the Prosecution should have attempted

3 to word the prosecution in a different way and the aim of that indictment

4 should have been to establish the truth and ensure a fair trial.