''kupiću'' hahahahah kakav kralj 

Prvi insert iz filma

Stiže tri-de Konan

Potraga ratnika iz Simerije počinje kao lična osveta, ali se ubrzo pretvara u epsku bitku protiv lukavih neprijatelja i krvoločnih čudovišta. Jedini spas narodu Hiborije od vladavine sila zla je Konan. U rimejku Konana varvarina igraju Džejson Momoa, Stiven Lang, Rouz Mekgauan, Ron Pelerman.

Markus Nispel uhvatio se u koštac sa Konanom varvarinom još 2009. godine. Svestan da je pravljenje rimejka filma koji je od Arnolda Švarcenegera napravio legendu, ali i obrnuto, hod po oštrici žileta, reditelj je korak po korak išao kao tri-de verziji poznate priče o ratniku iz Simerije.

Priča počinje negde u Bronzanom dobu kada dečak kojem ubijaju roditelje i potpuno uništavaju selo počinje da se suočava sa nemilosrdnom svakodnevicom.

Da bi preživeo Konan je po potrebi lopov, pirat, ratnik.

Godine prolaze, avanture i žene smenjuju se sve dok životni put ne dovede Konana do zlikovca koji je odgovoran za uništenje njegovog plemena.



Da bi se osvetio Kalar Zimu (Stiven Lang), ratnik mora da pobedi razna čudovišna stvorenja, ali i moćnu vešticu (Rouz Mekgauan).

U 112 minuta tri-de akcije igraju i Ron Pelerman (kovač, Konanov otac) i Rejčel Nikols (Tamara).

Producenti za novog Konana u januaru 2010. godine, između Kelana Luca (u Sumrak sagi tumači Emeta Kalena) i Džejsona Mamoe, definitivno biraju glumca rođenog na Havajima.



Izbor glavnog glumca za rimejk nije dugo ostala tajna i ubrzo nailazi na oštru osudu poštovalaca Arnolda Švarcenegera.

Nekadašnji član glumačke ekipe serije Čuvari plaže pre početka snimanja morao je da doda još pet kilograma mišića, a na intenzivnoj šestonedeljnoj obuci učio je borilačke veštine kako bi verodostojno predstavio ratnika osvetnika.

Dugo očekivani Konan varvarin (Conan the Barbarian) u svetske bioskope stiže 19. avgusta.



Izvor: RTS

Konan Varvarin ode u pisce

Glumac Džejson Momoa, novi filmski Konan Varvarin, napisao je scenario za nastavak filma.

remijera novog Konana biće 19. avgusta u Americi, a Momoa je priznao da nije gledao originalni film iz 1982, u kom naslovnu ulogu tumači Arnold Švarceneger.

Momoa je otkrio da je lično napisao scenario za drugi deo filma, i da očekuje da studio odobri snimanje nastavka.

U međuvremenu, Momoa, koji je poznat po nekoliko uloga u televizijskim serijama, ponovo je stekao ogromnu bazu fanova ulogom plemenskog vođe u hit seriji "Igra prestola" mreže HBO. Trenutno je u toku snimanje druge sezone.

Izvor: Mondo

Švarci može u penziju, upoznajte novog Konana Varvarina

Ulogu Konana Varvarina u novoj ekranizaciji čuvenog stripa tumačiće nova holivudska zvezda u usponu Džejson Momoa. Iako je Konana teško zamisliti kao bilo koga drugog nego kao Arnolda Švarcenegera, koji ga je igrao u kultnom filmu iz 1982. godine, Džejson je već pobrao simpatije filmske publike...

Ovaj glumac srodom s Havaja nabacio je 10 kilograma mišića samo za novog "Konana", iako je i pre toga bio izuzetno korpulentan.

Džejson ipak nije uspeo da dostigne mišićnu masu Švarcenegera iz prvog filma, ali to je i razumljivo s obzirom na činjenicu da je Švarci tada obilato koristio steroide, koji su danas zabranjeni.

Na pitanje kako je uspeo da "nabaci" toliku mišićnu masu, novi Konan kaže da je tajna u mukotrpnom vežbanju.

"Na snimanju filma smo prvo radili dva sata vežbi s mačevima, onda napravimo malu pauzu, ja pojedem pohovano pile, onda još dva sata podizanja tegova i na kraju kardio trening", kaže Džejson, dodajući da nakon toga ima snage samo da ode kući i odmara.

U novom nastavu ovog filma Konan kreće u osvetnički pohod nakon što mu suparničko pleme ubija oca.

Usput se bori protiv čudovišta, veštica i drugih ratnika, da bi na kraju došao i do čoveka odgovornog za smrt njegovg oca...



Konan je Ničeov "viši čovek"



Film "Konan Varvarin" nastao je prema istoimenom kultnom stripu autora Roberta I. Hauarda. Strip kritičar Uroš Smiljanić kaže za "Blic" da veliku Konanovu popularnost nije teško objasniti.

"Prvo i osnovno je da je Konan, kako je i sam Robert I. Hauard objasnio, čovek sa kojim je (skoro) svakom muškarcu lako da se identifikuje. Hauard je sam u jednom pismu svom prijatelju H.P. Lavkraftu objašnjavao kako, kada zatvori oči sebe vidi kao varvarina koji u sandalama, ogrnut kožom gazi nekim prašnjavim putem krećući se ka nepoznatoj pustolovini i ovo je maštarija koja je bliska svakome ma koliko civilizovan i kulturno sofisticiran bio", kaže Smiljanić.

Prema njegovim rečima, Konan je čovek neopterećen civilizacijom i kulturom, neka vrsta prirodne sile, čiste životne energije koja je uvek u pravu.

"Hauard je svojevremeno pojašnjavao kako Konan nije čovek koji puno razmišlja o problemu već problem rešava i to čitaoci originalnih priča o Konanu i kasnijih Marvelovih i Dark Horseovih stripova prepoznaju. Svako od nas bar jednom dnevno poželi da ne mora da se nosi sa brojnim društvenim konvencijama, da ne mora da pravi kompromise u poslovnom ili privatnom životu, da bude slobodan da uradi ono što oseća da je ispravno čak i ako svi vele da je pogrešno. Konan je onaj delić nas koji to i može da uradi, čovek koji ima veliku – ne samo fizičku – snagu jer je apsolutno uveren u sebe i ispravnost svojih nauma i čak i kada greši on to čini dostojanstveno i bez kajanja. Konan je Ničeov viši čovek, čovek koji čini ono što je ispravno jer ima takvo prisustvo i snagu volje da sam definiše to što je ispravno – i istorija mu daje za pravo. Da ne pominjemo da žene žele da budu sa njim a muškarci žele da budu on", kaže Smiljanić.

Izvor: Blic

Lici mu ova uloga, ovom novom Konanu

da bas je ruzan

Pravi "Barbarian", jos u Game of Trones ona uloga 

Izgleda da je film gori nego što sam mislio da je moguće.

I have seen the new “Conan the Barbarian”. And it is an awful mess of a movie.

There is no explanation for anything that happens. Things just come with no rhyme or reason. There is no sense of pacing or emotional depth. The videoclip style made it impossible to get a handle on what’s going on. The inconsistencies range from contradicting Howard, to contradicting their own damn tale. Plot holes threaten to engulf the entire film – characters just disappear, Chekhov’s guns are left on the mantelpiece, dialogue is disjointed with no logical flow.

I blame Marcus Nispel for the whole debacle. I am pretty sure he destroyed this movie with bad ideas, no direction for the actors, and a poor choice of shots. I blame the producers too, of course, because they don’t put enough money, time or effort into this flick.

I am not a great fan of Arnold or John Millius, but I must admit that the 1982 movie was really good. It doesn’t have much dialogue, but some of the lines are truly poetic, and the characters say more with the eyes than many others with a thousand of words.

I am not a Howard purist either. I have read the original stories once and I enjoyed them, that’s all. I would prefer a straight adaptation, but I have no problem if they invent a good new story.

I love sword & sorcery movies. It is my favorite genre. Before the screening I had no prejudices towards anyone involved, and I really wanted to enjoy the experience. But this film is worse than “Conan the Destroyer”, worse than “Kull the Conqueror” and even worse than “Red Sonja”. Worse, far worse than “The Scorpion King”.

The fight scenes are embarrassing. Tedious and confusing. This is not an insignificant flaw in an action movie! Everything happens too fast, with too many close ups. And the editing is a real disaster. There are a lot of continuity errors, crossing the sight lines, and no sense of place.

Rachel Nichols’ character, Tamara, never caught my interest. She is pretty, but with no outstanding characteristics. She gets in some action scenes, but it is simply ridiculous. Nichols looks fragile all the time, and she is supposed to be a nun, so there is no explanation about her fighting skills.

Stephen Lang is a cheesy over-the top-villain without much charisma. Rose Mcgowan is not sexy or menacing enough. Most of the other bad guys have no presence, no background, no lines of dialogue, no character arc… they even have no names!

I think Jason Momoa is a good actor. I have enjoyed him in Game of Thrones and Stargate. He was a good choice. But, unfortunately, you never see him as Conan the Cimmerian…

First, because he doesn’t look like Conan. His hair is not black enough, he has no square cut mane, he is not big enough and, most important of all, he has no volcanic blue eyes.

Second, because he doesn’t speak like Conan. Forget the long philosophical monologues or the subtle irony. This character talks like a self-confident bully. He doesn’t even say “Crom” in the entire movie!

Third, because he doesn’t act like Conan. The original character is a free man that enjoys the fruits of adventure and has learned to fight for survival. The protagonist of this movie is a cruel sociopath that enjoys torturing people, and doesn’t hesitate in killing women.

The film’s modest budget means the special effects are unpolished. In a summer blockbuster this is plainly unacceptable. The giant squid looks terrible, and the great Hyborian cities are like a bad matte painting from the fifties. The swords looks like plastic, the clothes are like halloween costumes, and the built sets are too little.

The story has a lot of absurd moments too. For example, there is a giant battleship that Khalar’s army moves along the Hyborian world… and in the sea battle, the bad guys use little boats. How stupid is that? In another scene, Conan’s swashbuckling friends save a village from slavers. Not only do the pirates have no reason to act in such a heroic way, but even the methods they use are highly questionable. They throw giant rocks, so the village they are trying to save is destroyed in the process. Then, they have a bloody hand-to-hand combat with the enemy. It is unbelievable that no slaves get harmed!

Again, I don’t want to blame the screenwriters for all that stuff. It seems that a lot of dialogue and key scenes have been cut in order to make the movie shorter and more action packed. We know how Hollywood works, and how bad directors can ruin a good script.

The final battle is truly disappointing. The averange viewer can accept a silly adventure movie if, at least, it has a good climax. This one does not. If you expect some giant monsters, incredible nightmarish sets, emotional depth, or the resolution of intriguing conflicts… forget it. There is no excitement, no drama, no spectacle, no real danger. Only bland characters fighting each other (without much conviction) in an ugly cave.

Finally, the soundtrack is mediocre at best. I cant recall a single theme from it. Coming from Basil Poledouris’ magnum opus, this is a clear problem.

Movies like Transformers 2 are bad because have no plot, but they are made by professionals that know how to tie two scenes together. This nasty experiment has been made with very little money by untalented people. It really needs a full recut with 30 minutes more, better pacing and coherent action scenes in order to start to be a movie.

I cant understand how these people decided to kill the franchise from its very inception. If this is the motion picture that Paradox put off the ground with so much effort… it would be better to have no Conan movie at all.

E to su najbolji pornići