WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 (UPI) -- Now that America has an Islamo-centric security posture, any danger that doesn't fit within the counter-fundamentalist framework tends to be ignored. That's sort of ironic, since the biggest military threats to democracy in the last century came from atheists.

Five years into the "global war on terror," the evidence suggests that Islamic radicals are real good at blowing each other up, but not so good at projecting power abroad. As long as western nations maintain halfway decent domestic security arrangements, the fundamentalists seem to be hobbled in repeating their one major success of Sept. 11, 2001. Given that fact -- five years and counting without a second big terrorist attack in America -- maybe we ought to be paying more attention to the kinds of state-based challenges that roiled the world so much in the past.

But we aren't. No one gives much thought to Russia's vast nuclear arsenal, which could still obliterate America in a few hours, even though that nation is reverting to authoritarian rule. Nobody seems to care about China's buildup of naval forces, its development of long-range missiles, or its new fighter. And nothing decisive has been done to prevent North Korea's march towards an indigenous nuclear arsenal. Each of these countries wields far more destructive power than the handful of nuts scattered across Arabia that we call al-Qaida. But because al-Qaida is a current irritant and other concerns seem less pressing, the capacity of U.S. forces to cope with state-based challenges is allowed to atrophy.

The decay is most pronounced in the U.S. Air Force, the service that would have to take the lead in coping with urgent threats posed by Russia, China and other industrialized countries. After 20 years of neglect, the Air Force's fleet of combat aircraft is older than the Navy's fleet of warships. During his four-year stint as defense secretary, current Vice President Dick Cheney killed the service's cold-war fighter programs, terminated the next-generation B-2 bomber at a mere 20 planes, slashed the future C-17 cargo plane program, and decimated every other facet of U.S. air power. Clinton's defense secretaries added back some planes that Cheney had cut, but delayed and decreased the next-generation F-22 fighter that was the centerpiece of plans for future air dominance. Then Preident Bush's long-serving Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld launched the entire U.S. Department of Defense on a leap-ahead trajectory to military transformation that ignored air power for another six years.

The end result is that the U.S. Air Force now flies 45-year-old aerial refueling tankers using a plane retired by commercial airlines a quarter-century ago; its F-22 fighter program has been cut 75 percent even though the aging fighters it would replace are so old they operate under flight restriction; its production lines for C-130 and C-17 transport planes are scheduled for closure despite lack of adequate airlift; and the service has canceled its planned family of aircraft for replacing cold-war radar and reconnaissance planes. The only bright spot on the horizon is the tri-service F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but Navy efforts to slash funding for JSF suggest the Air Force can't even count on that program coming to fruition.

Air Force pilots have a favorite story they tell that captures the meltdown of American air power over the past 20 years. Brig. Gen. David Deptula was flying his F-15 over northern Iraq in 1999 when cockpit gauges went haywire and the fuel reading plummeted to zero. It turned out insulation on the plane's wiring had rotted away with age, shorting out the electrical system. The punch-line of the story was that Gen. Deptula was flying the same F-15 he had flown 20 years earlier as a young captain. But most of the people who tell the story don't know it has a new punch-line: Gen. Deptula's son, a first lieutenant, is now flying the same plane in the Pacific -- nearly 30 years after it was built. Maybe it's time the Air Force finally gets some new planes, before a real threat comes along.

Izvor:IZVOR

odlican tekst

Хе,хе,лепо је знати да нисмо једини...мада ми је већ досадила америчка параноја.Овај што је ово писао сигурно живи у бункеру 100м под земљом или нешто тако... 
На крају ће почети да праве нуклеарне пројектиле који могу стати у ђачку торбу или минијатурне ЈСФ'ове...чисто да се деца не плаше... 

Ha ha ha ha...e jesi blesav Iljusine 

nije ovo naivno ... americhka vojna industrija ne moze da zaradi koliko bi htela u borbi protiv terorista ,pa su zato spremni da eskaliraju neprijateljstva po svetu da bi imali razloga da traze josh para . radi se o ljudima koji bi sve uradili zbog novca ,shto ih chini veoma opasnim za chovechanstvo ...

Istina je to.Posle hladnog rata i raspada SSSR odnosno pada komunizama morali su naci novog neprijatelja i nasli su ga
takozvani "svetski terorizam" kome ce oni stati u kraj mada ja verujem da su sve to oni izmislili.Ali mislim da ce se sada
stvari promeniti posle Irak nemaju ozbiljnijeg protivnika od Irana sa kojim se kosto svi znamo nije igrati...
Nemoze se do veka terati sila 

ljudi bf_109_g_6 je sasvim u pravu oni traze neprijatelja samo da bi uzeli pare tako su izmislili teroristicke napade.i krenuli u "osvajanja" Prvo ih je napao bin laden sto je nemoguce jer da je tako lako unistiti ameriku pravi teroristiti bi je vec unistili taj napad 9/11 su amerikanci sami sebi spremili i krenuliu avganistan da se tamo bore protiv terorizma posle u irak zbog nafte pod izgovorom da ovi imaju oruzije za masovno unistenje a zna se da nemaju a skoro su hteli da uvedu sankcije iranu i koreji
pa mislim nekome ce puci film i ode sve u pip

posle hladnog rata dugo su lutali za terminom- izgovorom i konacno ga nadjoshe "svetski terorizam".
jedan "izam" su zamenili drugim.

Bice zanimljivo sada gledati amere posto su Iracki narod "oslobodili" tiranina i podarili im sve blagodeti demokratije,
i takodje da ne zaboravimo Avganistan koji su "procistili" od navodno terorizma.Pa me sad zanima sta im je  na
umu oko Iran se vrte videcemo mada nije Iran *ickin dim do zuba su naoruzani...Po meni dostojan protivnik,dosta
su se ameri tukli sa neki malim drzavicama i kurcili da vidimo sad...

jebali bi jeza u ledja ko u vijetnamu