Pozdrav!

   Ja mislim da nema niti jedne pesme ili spota iz domace muzicke produkcije koji pak necete moci naci, odgledati i na vas racunar snimiti sa youtube-a!

   S tim u vezi moje pitanje - zar to nije piraterija bez premca (?) sto je dozvoljeno da se kaci na youtube servere i kako nije sankiconisana/zabranjena ista?

   Ovo vazi i za neke filmove (?)

   Jedan moj drug je pre 5-6 godina imao impozantnu muzicku arhivu MP3 pesama na CDovima. Istu je prodavao (i azurirao) lokalnim (malim) radio stanicama u unutrasnjosti zemlje (npr. radiju Mali Zvornik!). Kadkada je imao "licencnih problema" s tim u vezi. A sada radio stanice same nezvanicno skidaju sa YouTube (i drugih!) servera muziku, i to je "OK" (?)

   Drugi serveri i servisi ove vrste na internetu me ne interesuju puno...

   Bas me kopka kako je dozvoljeno tj. zasto niko ne brani na YouTube upload (i besplatan download) ama bas svega sa nase domace muzicke scene?

---

YouTube wins piracy case against Spanish TV station
September 23rd, 2010 - 14:21 UTC
by Andy Sennitt.

YouTube cannot be held responsible for screening images uploaded on its site, a Spanish court said today, throwing out a case brought by a local TV channel over alleged copyright infringement. Google, which owns the video-sharing site YouTube, immediately hailed the decision as a “clear victory for the Internet.”

Spanish private television channel Telecinco had accused YouTube of violating its intellectual property rights by broadcasting images that belonged to it. An initial ruling in 2008 backed Telecinco but Google challenged that decision and the Madrid court has now reversed the judgement on appeal.

Telecinco believed that “the broadcast on the (YouTube) Internet site of various audiovisual recordings … was a violation of the intellectual property rights of Telecinco,” the Madrid court said in its ruling, made on Monday but released today. But it is “physically impossible to control all the videos that are made available to users, as there are in fact more than 500 million.

“YouTube is not a supplier of content and therefore has no obligation to control ex-ante the illegality” of what is on its site, said the ruling, issued in Spanish. “Its only obligation is to cooperate with the holders of the rights in order to immediately withdraw the content once the infraction is identified.”

Google said the decision is “a clear victory for the Internet and the rules that govern it. “This decision reaffirms European law which recognizes that content owners (not service providers like YouTube) are in the best position to know whether a specific work is authorised to be on an Internet hosting service,” Google said in a statement. “If Internet sites had to screen all videos, photos and text before allowing them on a website, many popular sites - not just YouTube, but Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and others - would grind to a halt.” It said YouTube provided a free tool known as Content ID “designed to prevent copyright abuses and give owners control over their content” which is used by more than 1,000 media companies.

Telecinco, controlled by Italian broadcaster Mediaset which is owned by Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, said YouTube was hurting Telecinco by airing episodes of its television shows before the channel broadcast them in Spain. There was no immediate reaction from Telecinco to the latest decision.

In June, a US judge also threw out a copyright lawsuit filed against YouTube by US entertainment giant Viacom, which sued Google and YouTube for a billion dollars in March 2007, alleging it used pirated video clips to boost its popularity. YouTube was a year-old Internet sensation when Google bought it in a 1.65-billion-dollar stock deal in 2006.

Any way...gde ti je taj, "besplatan download" ?To sto, na googlu mozes da nadjes programe, online, ili one koji se DL, pa da preko toga skines nesto sa You Tube-a, to nema nikakve veze...druga stvar bi bila, da youtube ubaci download opciju...a i ne mogu da proveravaju svaki video, jbg. .

YouTube nema opciju za download

A što se skidanja tiče, ne može se utvrditi da li je mp3 fajl licenciran jer se sa diskova prebacuju i konvertuju u drugi format na kompjuter ili se kupuju sa interneta, dok je sa druge strane filmove zabranjeno kopirati, stoga moraju ostati na dvd-u.

Ako neko ima autorska prava za određeni materijal okačen na YT može da kontaktira administraciju i oni će to ukloniti. Toliko o pirateriji.

YT služi kao promocija, jer je piraterija jako rasprostranjena i muzičari uglavnom mogu samo da profitiraju od koncerata.

Preteče me pleybeck

интересује ме ко то скида музику са јутјуба?
који је ту квалитет звука? можда 64 кбпс

Mrgec, kada pokrenes YT downloader, u programu imas jednu opciju vizuelno prezentovanu u vidu 'reglera' kojeg, ako pomeris vise ka 'high quality' onda dobijes bolji kvalitet zvuka (ali tada i skinuti fajl vise zauzima), ali ako ga pomeris vise ka low quality onda fajl manje zauzima (ali ti bude nesto losiji kvalitet zvuka)...
Nadam se da sam ti ovo lepo objasnio )
A ko skida, cekaj da razmislim... pa otprilike veliki broj korisnika to radi!!

знам ја то...нисам баш толико неук
и кад то урадиш квалитет звука је опет прилично незадовољавајући...зар није боље скидати музику са рапидшера,мегауплоада или торената где је квалитет звука углавном 320 кбпс

Zavisi sta si skidao sa YT. odnosno zavisi od kvaliteta uploadovanog materijala. Evo ti jedan primer: potrazi video klip sa ove 3 reci: Neda Ukraden Obraz. On ce biti niskog kvaliteta ma kakvo podesavanje da ti izaberes pri snimanju istog jer je takav uploadovan. Drugo, kvalitet tvojih zvucnika takodje igra bitnu ulogu u celoj prici. Ne znam, ja sam sveukupno imao uredno iskustvo sto se kvaliteta zvuka na YT tice.

јој

не бих баш да то пуштам на компјутеру...бојим се да ће ми црћи машина

ево ти нпр овај клип...он је у хд са одличним тоном и сликом...мада,кад пустим студијску верзију те песме коју сам скинуо са торента или нпр оригинални цд тог албума звук се не може поредити