Simulations conducted by British Aerospace and the British Defense Research Agency compared the effectiveness of the Rafale, EF-2000, and F-22 against the Russian Su-35 armed with active radar missiles similar to the AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). The Rafale achieved a 1:1 kill ratio (1 Su-35 destroyed for each Rafale lost). The EF-2000 kill ratio was 4:1(4 Su-35's destroyed for each EF-2000 lost)

The F-22 achieved a ratio of 10 to 1.

This means that it only takes one F-22 to destroy ten Su-35's! The F-22 might be expensive, but think about it, ten Su-35's cost way more than one F-22 Raptor!

The PAK-FA only exists on paper, there's not even a prototype yet.

So if you want to be realistic and talk about who is ahead right now than its actually very simple. The American F-22 Raptor is currently the best fighter jet in the world under production.

***Note***

Russia has not ordered Su-37s, the aircraft is not in production.

The two Su-37 prototypes that existed were converted into Su-35 Flankers, another Sukhoi prototype fighter.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

That statistic is bull shit for me.

Su-35 Vs. F-22. 1:10 ? ? ?. I don't understund.1 Su-35 vs. 1 F-22, Su-35 downed, another Su-35 take off, again F-22 downed it. After 5-6 missiles fired from F-22, F-22 must reload. So, this will be for infinite.

If 10 Su-35 are in the air vs. 1 F-22, F-22 will down 5-6 Su-35 maybe fewer, due to SU ability to evade missiles (maybe best ability in the world), F-22 will have no missile, so. . mission for the remaining Su will be easy.
10:1 is not a chance for SU. is like infinite to 1 ratio.
But is still bull shit for me. From where americans know the detection ability of the Su-35, or ECM or ECCM, or stealth (plasma) etc. Be more realists. Of course F-22 is the best in the world, I agree.

Izvor: http://www.flymig.com/

 

piece of crap.........