" Naser Orić ima onaj genijalan argument - ja sam znao šta će oni da urade, pa sam hteo to da predupredim i da sam ih pobio više, ne bi se desila Srebrenica."
naser oric to kaze ,o njemu kao covjeku i "heroju" se svasta zanimljivo moglo procitati u onom feljtonu vecernjih novosti koji se zove planirani haos ,a koji sam kopirao na drugu temu o srebrenici!

zanimljiv mi je stav mnogih srpskih clanova i moderatora na ovom forumu ciji je stav da je u srebrenici pocinjen genocid..a i kako nebi bi nakon onolikog propagandnog materijala koji nam "braca" iz sarajeva svakodnevno salju!ovu temu i otvaram kako bi se napokon otvorilo(makar na ovom forumu) jedno pitanje koje srpski narod muci vec 15-ak godina bez izgleda u skori svrsetak!!najvise me pogadja sto isti ti moderatori zakljucavaju teme koje imaju za cilj otvaranje diskusije o srebrenici iz malo drukcijeg ugla gledanja na cijelu stvar..nadam se da i ova tema nece tako proci..

zanimljiv je stav Noama Comskog koji negira genocid u srebrenici u nekim svojim djelima ,iako zvanicno govori da je genocida bilo(mora to govoriti) u svojim djelima na perfidan nacin negira bilo kakav genocid..

za one kojima je lik djelo ovog covjeka nepoznato evo link.. chomsky

Chomsky never directly stated that he denies Srebrenica genocide, he did seem to justify the Srebrenica massacre by suggesting that the massacre was provoked - here is what he said:

Srebrenica was an enclave, lightly protected by UN forces, which was being used as a base for attacking nearby Serb villages. It was known that there's going to be retaliation. When there was a retaliation, it was vicious. (Civilization versus Barbarism? December 17, 2004).

Furthermore, in his article titled Imperial Presidency, Chomsky provocatively uses quotes when refering to Srebrenica genocide:

...Or Srebrenica, almost universally described as “genocide” in the West. In that case, as we know in detail from the Dutch government report [editor's note: NIOD Report bias, read bellow] and other sources, the Muslim enclave in Serb territory, inadequately protected, was used as a base for attacks against Serb villages, and when the anticipated reaction took place, it was horrendous. The Serbs drove out all but military age men, and then moved in to kill them. There are differences with Falluja. Women and children were not bombed out of Srebrenica, but trucked out, and there will be no extensive efforts to exhume the last corpse of the packrats in their warrens in Falluja. There are other differences, arguably unfair to the Serbs. [Canadian Dimension, January/February 2005 (Volume 39, Number 1)]

jedno je neciji stav a drugo je presuda suda...

pa i u nasem sudu su klinton,bler,olbrajt i ostali skotovi osudjeni na robiju pa nikom nista tako da....zabole me za presudu haskog suda

5.000 mrtvih neprijateljskih bandita i zlikovaca u Srebrenici - najveci genocid nakon II s.r.
izraelsko konstatno istrebljivanje Palestinaca od 1948. - dozvoljeni nacin etnickog uredenja drzave.

  halo... 

to sudjenje je bilo samo slika naseg sudskog sistema


u evropi! a Izrael nije u evropi

Da sam ja bio tamo savetovao bih Mladica da ih sve pobije pa tako ne bi bilo ni svedoka  

kurac, ja bih mu savetovao da se ne kurci i da one koji su vojno sposobni zarobi, da oruzje oduzme i da odsece ruku svakom vojniku koji pokusa nesto da uradi zarobljenicima

pa i hag je totalna sprdnja

ma da.Odavno se zna da na ovom svetu pravde nema.