Kao sto rekoh, ne.

meni se isto ostvara i dvojka i petica..

A sto ne koristis stariju verziju ako ti ta vise odgovara?

Nisi jedini osetio poteskoce http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=16985 probaj malo ovde da vidis ima nekih ideja http://www.geisswerks.com/geiss/faq_plug.html  samo sto je za plugin

@Karavla

Nisam rekao da mi vise odgovara vec da imam problema sa peticom. Zasto da ne koristim noviju verziju samo zato sto imam nekih manjim poteskoca koji i nisu previse bitni kao sto sam i napomenuo.

@lazacar

Sad cu da vidim sta oni kazu

Question:   Why does it run so darn slow?

Answer #1:   Have you tried 8-bit color? This is the target color depth for the program. Higher bit depths (16,24,32) are there for posterity and the age of 1-gigahertz machines. They require 3 times as much processing: one for each red, green and blue buffer, as opposed to one monochrome (paletted) buffer in 8-bit modes; and then the blit (image copy) to the video card has to send about four times the volume of data every frame. As you can see, 8-bit color is going to be a lot smoother.

Answer #2:   Have you tried a lower resolution, like 640x480, or tried setting your "vertical screen size" to about 50%? The image is smooth enough that once you're at 640x480, you can't see much of a difference between it and higher resolutions. Also, the 50% vertical screen size saves a lot of CPU time and makes a cool letterbox effect.

Answer #3:   Are you running an AMD or Cyrix (as opposed to Intel)? That could be it. I've been able to tweak the main loop to very high frame rates on the Intel, but no matter what I try for the AMD, I can't get the same performance out of it. The AMD and Cyrix are good processors, but for this specific muscle of the processor, they don't hold up as well. Other related hardware could be RAM... slow RAM will hurt you, or a slow or small L2 cache will hurt very bad. Also, a cheap motherboard with a slow bus could drop performance too. Your video card shouldn't make a huge difference, though, as long as it has EDO or faster RAM, and is PCI or AGP (AGP is not taken advantage of yet... anybody want to buy me an AGP motherboard & video card so I can do it? . Also, a 3d-accelerated video card will make NO difference.. What you see in Geiss right now is not hardware accelerated (nor can it be).

Answer #4:   Don't forget to minimize other windows first... this can make a huge difference, especially under '98.

Nista od ovoga ne verujem da je. Jeste da imam AMD procesor ali jbg nemam malo rama (512) i ploca mi je Asus A7V8X-X tako da ne verujem.

Na onom forumu kazu da je virus ili spyware ili tako nesto. Evo sta ja imam instalirano i redovno koristim:

Ad-Aware SE Professional
Spybot - Search & Destroy
CCleaner
RegCleanr
SystemCleaner
TuneUp Utilities 2006

tako da sigurno ni to nije... 

Pa stvar je sto se cudno ponasa sam na nekim sistemima, i onda ljudi daju takve glupe savete naravno da nije nista od toga jedino da probas da ga obrises kompletno i to ides Uninstall da obrises sve iz Registry-ja i da skines ova dva file-a obavezno C:\Windows i imas dva ini file ili jedan da ga jebem posto ja drugi nisam mogo da nadjem a i drugi verovatno sam skino jel mu nisam dao agenta a upravo je za njega znaci treba da imas dva file i to winamp.ini i winampa.ini ako imas skidaj oba winamp.ini imas sigurno i skini ga a ovaj ako ima ima ako ne to je to

aj da ne otvarma novu temu za mali problem:

Naime u winapmu 5, kada hotju da dodam neku pesmu i idem na L izbaci mi listu ali nije arranged by name nego nesto izmesano. Probao sam sve zivo sto sam se setio ali nikako da mi stalno kad udjem bude arranged by name. Kako to da uradim? Hvala unapred. 

Izbacio sam ceo winamp i ini fajl iz wina (bio je samo jedan. Onda sam ponovo instalirao samo bez mnogo stvari (video, library...) i sad radi brze

ako te klasika ne interesuje poskidaj skinove
brzina nije bitna .,....