Arctic Ice Grows 30 Per Cent In a Year

Predictions of “ice free” summer for first time in history completely debunked

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Alarmist scientists who predicted that the North Pole could be “ice free” this summer as a result of global warming have been embarrassed after it was revealed that Arctic ice has actually grown by around 30 per cent in the year since August 2007.

Back in June, numerous prominent voices in the scientific community expressed fears of a mass melting of the polar ice caps, including David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, who told National Geographic Magazine, “We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history].”

“This summer’s forecast—and unusual early melting events all around the Arctic—serve as a dire warning of how quickly the polar regions are being affected by climate change,” adds the article.

In February, Dr. Olav Orheim, head of the Norwegian International Polar Year Secretariat, told Xinhua, “If Norway’s average temperature this year equals that in 2007, the ice cap in the Arctic will all melt away, which is highly possible judging from current conditions.”

As per usual, the reality has failed to match the hype of the climate doomsayers.

According to collated data from the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and the University of Illinois, Arctic ice extent was 30 per cent greater on August 11, 2008 than it was on the August 12, 2007. This is a conservative estimate based on the map projection.

The video below highlights the differences between those two dates,” reports The Register. “As you can see, ice has grown in nearly every direction since last summer - with a large increase in the area north of Siberia. Also note that the area around the Northwest Passage (west of Greenland) has seen a significant increase in ice. Some of the islands in the Canadian Archipelago are surrounded by more ice than they were during the summer of 1980.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKLiHWRaJU4

But what of the Antarctic down south? Figures tell us that ice coverage in the year since August 2007 has grown by nearly one million square kilometers.

As The Register article notes, “The Arctic did not experience the meltdowns forecast by NSIDC and the Norwegian Polar Year Secretariat. It didn’t even come close. Additionally, some current graphs and press releases from NSIDC seem less than conservative. There appears to be a consistent pattern of overstatement related to Arctic ice loss.”

A general cooling trend across the planet is now clearly apparent as sunspot activity, the main driver of climate change, dwindles to almost nothing.

As we reported last week, A top observatory that has been measuring sun cycles for over 200 years predicts that global temperatures will drop by two degrees over the next two decades as solar activity grinds to a halt and the planet drastically cools down, potentially heralding the onset of a new ice age.

While the mass media, Al Gore and politicized bodies like the IPCC scaremonger about the perils of global warming and demand the poor and middle class pay CO2 taxes, both hard scientific data and circumstantial evidence points to a clear cooling trend.

How man-made global warming advocates will spin this one remains to be seen - maybe they will just continue to adopt their current tactic by claiming that any geological or weather event whatsoever, be it hurricanes, earthquakes, droughts or floods, temperature increase or decrease, and even a 30 per cent growth of the polar ice cap - is a result of that evil life-giving gas that we exhale - CO2.

Ja sam na nekom naučnom sajtu čitao a kasnije na nacionalnoj geografiji gledao dokumentarac, koji govori da je nagnuce zemljine ose nastupilo usled sudara Zemlje i planete veličine Marasa u ranoj fazi nastanka sunčevog sistema. Tada je zemlja bila još meka i vrela pa nije ostalo dokaza o tome na planeti. Teorija je nastala zbog toga što je  na Mesecu, koji je nastao od ostataka Zemlje i te planete, nađen materijal za koji je utvrđeno da vodi poreklo sa Zemlje. A voda je nastala kasnije verovatno donešena kometama i meteorima. U ranim fazama raznih sitema dolazi do ovakvih sudara planeta. Naravno ovo je samo još jedna od teorija tako da nemora biti tačna.

Makros_Crni
Da to je jedna od teorija,a to sam i ja učio u školi.Ali ta teorija ima dosta slabosti.Da je zemlja bila još onda nagnuta,ledeni polovi bi postojali od postanka života na zemlji.A to što na južnom i severnom polu su pronadjene tropske skoljke, fosili zivotinja koji zive u tropskim i suptropskim predelima govore da to nije tako bilo.A voda nikako nije mogla da nastane od pada meteora,pošto su vrlo retki meteori koji sadrže vodu.

1deki
99% izveštaja na internetu govore suprotno.Kao što rekoh ako ne verujemo izveštajima možemo verovati svojim očima.
A evo jednog od takvih izveštaja koje govore suprotno.
“Recent studies indicate Arctic perennial ice is declining seven to 10 percent each decade,” explained Ron Kwok, with the lab in Pasadena, Calif. “Our study gives the first reliable estimates of how perennial ice replenishment varies each year at the end of summer. The amount of first-year ice that survives the summer directly influences how thick the ice cover will be at the start of the next melt season.”
Izvor: Far North Science

A slike Artika govore sam za sebe.

Slane pustinje postoje, ali ko zna kakve bi reakcije nastale u kombinaciji sa otopljenom vodom, tj. da li bi uopste doslo do tolikog porasta vode da se pustinje "natope"

Anea,samo da uzmemo Saharu,najveću pustinju.
"Elevations over much of the Sahara average only 1,000 to 1,500 feet (300 to 450 m) above sea leve."
Znači nalazi se na nadmorskoj visini od oko 300 metara u dubini,dok se približavajući obali smanjuje se ta nadmorska visina.
I ako još uzmemo obzir peščane dine u Sahari koji mogu biti veoma visoki,onda.........

Evo šta sad pročitah u Blic-u. Zemlja je 2008. bila najhladnija od početka ovog veka, pošto je vremenski fenomen "La Ninja" snizio prosečnu temperaturu na nivo iz 2000. Kompjuterski modeli sugerišu da može doći do daljeg hlađenja površine Zemlje u narednih par godina.

Slusao sam na TV  da je zemlja bila uglavnom zalednjena a da je ovaj preiod izuzetak i da se ocekuje zahladjenje.

Neznam po kojim statistikama su to zaključili,jer sve statistike suprotno govore.
A evo par sajtova koje to potvrđuju.

Izvor: Nnationalacademies


Izvor: defra.gov


Izvor: realclimate

Ne znam nisu naveli. Ovaj tekst mi je bio čudan, zato sam ga i postavio.Toliko priče, svakog dana, o globalnom zagrejavanju i kako je sve toplije, a onda jedan ovakav tekstić na samom dnu rublike svet.

Mediji su placeni da lazu. Da obmanjuju i pretvaraju narod u robote koje je lako kontrolisati.
Bodies like sheep, go back to sleep.