Hakeri su provalili u računare američkog Ministarstva odbrane i preuzeli terabajte podataka s informacijama o projektu Joint Strike Fighter, vrednom 300 milijardi dolara, navodi američki list The Wall Street Journal.



Radi se o projektu razvoja „nevidljivog“ lovačkog aviona, a ukradene datoteke se odnose na dizajn Joint Strike Fightera i njegove elektronske sisteme. Mada se čini da bi se ukradene informacije mogle iskoristiti za pripremu odbrane od novog lovačkog aviona, najosetljivije datoteke nisu bile ugrožene, pošto se čuvaju na računarima koji nisu povezani s Internetom, piše u izveštaju američkog lista.

Ovaj napad pobudio je mnogo više pitanja nego što je dao odgovora. Primera radi, u izveštaju ne piše kako su napadači uspeli da preuzmu terabajte podataka pre nego što su otkriveni. Preko relativno brze veze, kao što je DSL ili kablovski modem, preuzimanje jednog terabajta traje i do nekoliko nedelja. U izveštaju se takođe navodi da bi iza napada mogla da stoji Kina, jer istražitelji veruju da su napadi započeti sa računara u toj zemlji. Međutim, istražitelji navode da počinioci ovog hakerskog napada još uvek nisu otkriveni. (M.Đ.)

Izvor

(sto se tice "nevidljivosti"-phhh...ko da ne moze jedan S-200 da ga skine...(a kamoli ista "mladje"...))
a sto se tice hakovanja...
sjajno!!!  samo neka nastave. 

Veselo, veselo!

ja mislim da je ovo ipak priprema javnosti za ukidanje ili barem drastichno redukovanje projekta JSF f-35 .naime ispostavlja se da :

- f-35 uopshte nije tako stealth ako nosi dodatno podvesno naoruzanje na krilima ....

- ako ga ne nosi onda mu je kapacitet relativno mali ...

- u vazdushnoj borbi zaostaje chak i za trenutnim lovcima kasne 4.generacije (su-27 derivati ,rafal ,tajfun ...) narochito ako se ogranichi samo na naoruzanje u internom spremishtu .

- cena projekta je vec odvratila mnoge potencijalne kupce , posebno zbog ekonomske krize ...

pa,naravno kad ne postoji stealth avion.
stvarno?zanimljivo... 
hvala na informacijama... 

Postoji stealth,da nije tako, ruski PAK-FA bi imao takav zahtev, a ima ga, stealth nije potpuna nevidljivost kao sto mnogi neupuceni misle, to je smanjeni radarski odraz u odnosu na tu velicinu aviona, prosto govoreci. Znaci avion cetvrte generacije velicine F-22 ima RCS od nekih 10-15 metara kvadratnih, dok stealth avion te velicine ima 10-100 puta manju odraznu povrsinu. Takav avion nije nemoguce uociti radarom, samo je to moguce na manjoj daljini sto daje takticku prednost takvom avionu u odnosu na cetvrtu generaciju.

Inace, F-22 je ukinut, tj. zatvaraju proizvodne pogone nakon izgradjenih 188 aviona (mislim da je ostalo jos 4-5 komada do te cifre), ali je zato dat prioritet F-35 u SAD, verovatno zbog vece mogucnosti zarade.

Sto se tice malog prostora za F-35, to je tacno, a obzirom da bi on trebao da bude okosnica RV vecine NATO zemalja, to bi mogao biti problem, obzirom da bi potencijalno neprijateljske zemlje mogle koristii PAK-FA koji ce verovatno biti u klasi jednog F-22, sto bi ove zemlje dovelo u veoma nezgodnu situaciju, zapravo inferiornu poziciju ukoliko ne bi imali podrsku SAD i njihovih F-22.

pa niko ovde nije ni mislio da stealth znaci apsolutno nevidljiv.to je nemoguce.
ja sam mislio na to da amerikanci previse nade polazu u stealth osobine aviona,umesto u druge osobine...
stvarno?  nisam znao... 

obongo izgleda ima neki deal sa proizvodjacima F-35 jer stvarno trazi ukidanje F-22 programa  :

On 6 April 2009, as part of the 2010 Pentagon budget announcement, Secretary of Defense Gates called for production of the F-22 to be phased out by fiscal year 2011, leaving the USAF with 187 fighters.[6] Spending on F-35 acquisition would be increased. Gates noted that although the US was currently engaged in two wars, the Raptor had yet to fly a single mission supporting either one. Said Gates, "It was not a close call. There is no military requirement for numbers beyond 187."[39][40] In an editorial in the Washington Post on April 13, 2009 USAF Secretary Michael Donley and his Chief of Staff Norton Schwartz stated that they supported Gates' decision, saying "The F-22 is a vital tool in the military's arsenal and will remain in our inventory for decades to come. But the time has come to move on."[41][42


---------------------------------

da se vratimo mi F-35 i njegovim problemima : ovo je tajni izveshtaj koji je procureo u australijske novine ,a tiche se kompjuterske simulacije borbe F-35 i Su-35 , koju su jeftiniji suhoji lako dobili  . posle je oko toga nastala velika kontroverza i rasprava se vodila po netu :

Australia's fighter jets 'clubbed' by Russians
September 11, 2008 - 10:04AM

The federal opposition has dismissed new doubts about the capacity of the multi-billion dollar Joint Strike Fighter to perform against jets used by Russia and China.

The JSF jets, for which Australia is likely to pay $16 billion, were comprehensively beaten in highly classified simulated dogfights against Russian-built Sukhoi fighter aircraft, it has been reported.

The war games, conducted at Hawaii's Hickam airbase last month, were witnessed by at least four RAAF personnel and a member of Australia's peak military spy agency, the Defence Intelligence Organisation, The West Australian said.

Opposition defence spokesman Nick Minchin said he was taking "with a grain of salt" the validity of the report.

"This is based on a computer game, computer modelling of the aircraft," he told Sky News.

"This is not real life."

Senator Minchin said he had a classified briefing on the JSF from its US manufacturer Lockheed-Martin which had promoted the aircraft as the most advanced jet fighter ever.

"I can't really say much about it, but this is a phenomenal aircraft.

"As our chief of defence Angus Houston has said this is a most extraordinary aircraft, it is the right aircraft for Australia."

The multi-purpose fighter would be the backbone of the United States military, Senator Minchin said.

"We are fortunate to be in it and the government should move to make the decision to acquire it."

WA Liberal backbencher Dennis Jensen said he had spoken to a third party with knowledge of the final classified test results who had claimed the JSF had been clubbed like baby seals by the simulated Sukhois, The West Australian reported.

He said the government should demand that the US Government sell it the F-22 which was already in operation instead of the JSF.

A response was been sought from the government.






izvor: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/articles/2008/09/11/1220857689496.html

al,dobro,to je samo simulacija.
i History channel kad pravi one budjave emisije verovatno koristi slicne metode,pa opet po njima ispada kako bi u pravoj borbi F-16 dobio Mig-29ku u dogfajtu,sto je glupost...
a i ja ne znam zasto porede ta dva aviona,kada nisu ni iste namene...
to je ko da sad ja uzmem i poredim Mig-15 i F-15,zato sto imaju slicna imena...(s tim sto se ovde porede avion iz 2. i 4. generacije,a u tekstu 4.5 i 5. ,ali shvatate sta ocu da kazem...)
SU-35 bi sigurno unakazio F-35 u borbi u letu,ali F-35 je verovatno zato bolji za napade na kopnu...

pa jeste simulacija ,ali na americhkim vojnim trenazerima ,dakle prilichno ozbiljan nivo ....