Odakle nam nafta???? Sta sve necu saznati...
Mili moji, trenutno smo u situaciji da nam jedino preostaje da se lepo sagnemo, pa ko nam ga utera, utera, a mi kazemo hvala... to je zbog toga sto smo se predugo kurcili na prazno a nismo znali da odradimo posao kako valja... Sad lepo da slusamo sta nam se kaze, kao deca, posto nismo bolji...

Mili moji, trenutno smo u situaciji da nam jedino preostaje da se lepo sagnemo, pa ko nam ga utera, utera, a mi kazemo hvala... to je zbog toga sto smo se predugo kurcili na prazno a nismo znali da odradimo posao kako valja... Sad lepo da slusamo sta nam se kaze, kao deca, posto nismo bolji...

Collaborating.  Although counterbalancing against American primacy has not happened yet, there is no reason that it cannot.  One counter-coalition that would be both plausible and potent would be an anti-American alliance of Russia and China.  Tensions between both countries and Washington have fluctuated, and are low at the moment, but U.S. policy on NATO expansion, the Balkans, moving bases into Central Asia, and defense of Taiwan provide long-term sources of conflict with both countries, and an incentive to them to subordinate their suspicions of each other to cooperation against the common threat of American pressure.  Such an alliance becomes more likely if conflict over the Taiwan issue grows at the same time as conflict between Russia and NATO over such matters as the status of Russians in Estonia.  

Countering.  Fanatical or desperate adversaries will seek to counter the United States by mobilizing diplomatic and political support for opposition to American force, or by developing “asymmetric” means of deterrence and retaliation.  North Korea, for example, tends to act not like a realistic weak state, but like a suicidal one ready to bring others down with it.  It or other rogue regimes may try confrontational strategies, despite the gross imbalance of power.  They will do this if they see no alternative to guarantee survival.  They may also do this for the purpose of deterring the United States.  The danger then is that Washington will see not deterrence, but provocation, and the deterrent strategy may provoke preventive war as an American response.